Image provided by: Silverton Country Historical Society; Silverton, OR
About Torch of reason. (Silverton, Oregon) 1896-1903 | View Entire Issue (May 15, 1902)
R eason . T orch of “ TRUTH BEARS THE TORCH IN THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH.” — Lucretius. VOL. 6. SILVERTON, O R E G O N , THURSDAY, MAY 15. Strive, Work and Hope. God, chose the three days of p esti lence; and, thereupon, God, the BT ADELAIDE A. PBOCTEB. com passionate, on account of the sin of David, killed seventy th o u T R IV E : y e t I do n o t p rom ise T h e p rize you d rea m of to d a y sand innocent m en! U nder the W ill n o t fade w hen you th in k to g ra sp it, same circum stances, what would a A nd m elt in y o u r h a n d aw ay; devil have done? B u t a n o th e r a n d h o lie r tre a s u re , S You w ould now p erc h an c e d isd a in , W ill com e w hen y o u r to il is over, A nd pay fo r all y o u r pain. W o rk: y e t I do n o t te ll you T he h o u r y o u long fo r now W ill n o t com e w ith ra d ia n c e v an ish ed , A nd 3 shadow u p o n its brow ; Yet, fa r th ro u g h th e m isty fu tu re , W ith a crow n of s ta r ry lig h t, A n h o u r of joy you know n o t Is w inging h e r s ile n t flight. H ope: th o u g h th e th in g you striv e fo r M ay n ev er c o m fo rt y o u r fe a rs— M ay n ev er rep a y y o u r to ilin g — Yet hope, th o u g h w ith tr u s tf u l te a rs; An answ er, n o t th a t you long for, B u t g ra n d e r, w ill com e one d ay ; Y o u r eyes are to o dim to see it, L e t w ork a n d hope lead y o u r way. —A d a p ted to th e New E ra. ABOUT THE HOLY BIBLE* And the Foundations of Faith. BY R O B ER T G. IN G ERSO LL. V. adm it th a t the history of R uth is in some respects a beautiful and touching story; th a t it is n a tu ra lly told, and th at her love for N aom i was deep and pure. But in the m atter of courtship we would h ard ly advise our daughters to fol low the exam ple of R uth. Still, we m ust rem em ber th a t R uth was a widow. Is there an y thing worth reading in the first and second books of Sam uel? Ought a prophet of God to hew a captured king in pieces? Is the story of the ark, its capture and return, of im portance to us? Is it possible th a t it was right, ju st and merciful to kill fifty thousand men because they had looked into a box? Of what use to us are the wars of Saul and David, the stories of G oliath and the Witch of E ndor? W hy should Jehovah have killed Uzzah for putting forth his hand to steady the ark, and forgiven David for m urdering U riah and stealing his wife? According to “Sam uel,” David took a census of the people. This excited the w rath of Jehovah, and as a punishm ent he allowed David to choose seven years of fam ine, a flight of three m onths from p u rsu ing enemies, or three days of pesti lence. David, having confidence in * These w onderful discourses of Ingersoll are n o t to be bad except in the T h ird and F ourth volum es of the D resden E dition. We w ill p rin t them in p a rt— each part reads as a whole. We d o th is because u n til the people are em ancipated fro m th e C atholic C hurch, the P ro te sta n t Bible, a n d the belief in “ th e su p e rn a tu ra l,’’ there is no hope for th is w orld.—E d . T o r c h . V 302 (1902.) Then comes the hook of E sther: In this we are told th at King Ahas- ueras was intoxicated; th a t he sent for his queen, V ashti, to come and show herself to him and his guests. Vashti refused to appear. This m addened the king, and he ordered that from every province the most beautiful girls should be brought before-him th at he m ight choose one in place of V ashti. Among others was brought E sther, a Jew ess. She was chosen and became the wife of the King. Then a gen tlem an, by the nam e of H ainan, wanted to have all the Jews killed, and the king, not knowing that E sther was of th at race, signed a decree th at all the Jew s should be killed. Through the efforts of Mordecai and E sther the decree was annulled and the Jews were saved. H ainan prepared a gallows on which to have Mordecai hanged, but the good E sther so managed m atters th at H ainan and his ten sons were hanged on the gallows th at H am an had built, and the Jews were a l lowed to m urder more than seventy five thousand of the king’s subjects. This is the inspired story of Esther. In the book of Jo b we find some elevated sentim ents, some sublim e and foolish thoughts, som ething of the wonder and sublim ity of nature, the joys and sorrows of life; but the story is infamous. Is there anything in First and Second Kings th a t suggests the idea of inspiration? When David is dying he tells his son Solomon *o m urder J o a b —not to let his hoar head go down to the grave in peace. W ith his last breath he com m ands his son to bring down the hoar head of Shimei to the grave with blood. H aving uttered these merciful words, the good David, the man after God’s heart, slept with his fathers. Was it necessary to inspire the man who wrote the history of the building of the temple, the story of the visit of the Queen of Sheba, or to tell the num ber of Solom on’s wives? W hat care we for the w ith ering of Jeroboam ’s hand, the pro phecy of Jehu, or the story of E lijah and the ravens? Can we be lieve th a t E lijah brought flames from heaven, or th a t he went at last to P aradise in a chariot of fire? Can we believe in the m ultiplication of the willow’s oil by Elisha, th at an.arm y w as^m itten with blindness, or th at an axe floated on the water? Does it civilize us to read about the beheading of the seventy sons of Some of tlie Psalm s are good, Ahab, the puttin g out of the eyes of m any are indifferent, and a few are Zedekiah and the m urder of his infamous. In them are mingled the sons? Is there one word in First vices and virtues. There are verses and Second Kings calculated to th a t elevate; verses th a t degrade. m ake men better? There are prayers for forgiveness F irst and Second Chronicles is and revenge. In the literature of hut a re-telling of what is told in the world there is nothing more First and Second Kings. The same heartless, more infam ous, than the old stories— a little left out, a little 109th Psalm . added, but in no respect made bet In the Proverbs there is much ter or worse. shrew dness, m any pithy and p ru The book of Ezra is of no im port dent m axim s, m any wise sayings. ance. He tells us th at Cyrus, King The sam e ideas are expressed in of Persia, issued a proclam ation for m any ways—the wisdom of econ building a tem ple at Jerusalem , and omy and silence, the dangers of th at he declared Jehovah to be the vanity and idleness. Some are triv real and only God. N othing could ial, some are foolish and m any are be more absurd. Ezra tells us wise. These proverbs are not gen about the retu rn from captivity, the erous— not altruistic. Sayings to building of the tem ple, the dedica the same effect are found am ong all tion, a few prayers, and this is all. nations. This book is of no importance, of Ecclesiastes is the most th o u g h t no use. ful book in the Bible. It was w rit Nehem iah is about the same, ten by an unbeliever—a philoso only it tells of the building of the pher— an agnostic. Take out the w allr the com plaints of the people interpolations, and it is in accord about taxes, a list of those who re ance with the thought of the n in e turned from Babylon, a catalogue' teenth century. In this book are of those who dw elt at Jerusalem , found the most philosophic and po and the dedication of the walls. etic passages in the Bible. Not a word in Nehemiah worth (T o be C o n tin u e d .) reading. NO. 19. CAMILLO HANKS, EX-TRAIN ROBBER. A Study in Sociology for the Benefit of “ Beginner” and Others. F ro m R eed s Iso n o m y , of M ay, 1902. H E passing of Camillo H anks, ex - trainrobber, allround crook and desperado, who was recently shot in this city (San Antonio, Tex.), by officers while resisting arrest, again strik ingly calls to m ind the ever- shifting phases of ch aracter and civilization. The m arau d er a n d . freebooter is as old as the race. There was a tim e when the robber won and held the adm iration of his fellows.* The songs of H om er are largely panegyrics of robbery. It is natural th at m ankind should have at first been the w orshippers of mere brawn and courage. The arts and sciences had not yet been cultivated. A griculture, the earliest civilizer of men, had not won them from a wild and nom adic life. And for thousands of years after the great nations of an tiq u ity had arisen, the tribe of the robber was num erous and widely extended. Cicero praised Porapey for having ridded the spas of pirates no less than for being an ornam ent of the Roman state. The chief business of Rome was the con quest of robber nations. As corrupt as she was, she stood for social stability, for the prevalence of order, the reign of law and the security of life and property. The barbarian hordes th a t overran her were in reality freebooters. Alaric, A ttila and Genseric were sim ply im perial thieves. They were av a ta rs of r a pacity and as fearless as resistless. The sword and fire of the Goth and V andal swept the Seven-hilled Queen o( the W orld away, but the spirit of robbery was not destined to trium ph over the genius of c iv il ization. It is Gibbon who says th a t ‘‘out of the woods of G erm any came the most civilized nations of m odern E urope.” The pirate and buccaneer have been the heroes of song and story. The genius of Byron is alm ost at its best when he sings of the C orsair. It is the tribute th a t men pay to courage, to daring adventure, to the mere gam bler for fortune whose life is his stake. Romance is filled with the exploits of Robert M acairesand Dick T urpins. It is doubtful if Hoisa and H engist, P haram ond and Fenacute, were little better than bold, bad bandits. The K nights of the Round Table have T •R e ad “ B e g in n e r’s” a rtic le on “ S o ci o lo g y ,” on 1st page, la s t T orch .