Image provided by: Silverton Country Historical Society; Silverton, OR
About Torch of reason. (Silverton, Oregon) 1896-1903 | View Entire Issue (March 27, 1902)
•> T H E TORCH OF REASON, S IL V E R T O N , OREGON , MARCH 27, E. M. 302 (1902.) “ B E G IN N E R ’ ’ A N S W E R E D ! than one side. If they know how to profit by it ho as not to let them selves be drawn into a narrow rut The Few Who Capture the Earth and Means of Living, Leave the Masses in it is a great gain. A n o th er c irc u m sta n c e th a t m ust act fa v o ra b ly on the sp irit of social e d u c a tio n in S w itz e rla n d seem s to he th is Tn an old d em o cracy like S w itz e rla n d , w h e r e every one is i n te re sted in p u b lic affairs, w here ev ery citizen is often caller! u p o n to vote, am i c o n se q u e n tly to form an o p in io n on law s of g reat social im p o rta n c e , professors a n d s tu d e n ts in th e h ig h e r in s titu tio n s a re n a t u ra lly in c lin e d to ta k e a special in te re s t in th e social side of every science th a t re la te s to m an . W e feel k een ly th e tr u th so well fo rm u la te d by M. E ouillee in the preface to his last re m a rk a b le work: “ T h e fu rth e r we go, th e m ore ev ery science becom es in s e p a ra b ly p r a c t ical a n d th e o re tic a l, u n til it can no longer d isc o n n ec t itself from its social a n d econom ic a p p lic a tio n s. T h e m oral sciences in p a r tic a la r are grow ing m ore a n d m ore so c ia l ized .” Dependence, Degradition and Misery. The Cunning That Effects It Is Immoral and Inhuman. The claim m ade by “ Beginner ’ in the T orch of March 6, th a t there has been rapid advancem ent of the lower or wage-earning class I do not deny, and there are good his toric reasons for it; but th at they will continue to so advance is sim ply flying in the face of facts, and of all the present evidence in the case. The advancem ent th a t the common people have made in the last IDO years or so, has been due m ainly to the opening up of Am er ica, with its unbounded resources, and the consequent opportunities which have opened a field for liber ty of thought and action which has had no parallel in all the history of the past, nor is it likely to have This is why we can perceive, es again in the future. At the time of the discovery of pecially in the universities of Hern, Ziirich, and Geneva, the tendency, America, the churches and nobles to conceive and treat in a social of the old world practically owned sp irit all the sciences th a t lend the land, wealth and m achinery of themselves to it, such as law, p h il the world, and hence the means of osophy, m orals pedagogy, hygiene, production. The common, or labor history, etc., thus unconsciously ing classes were mere serfs and following the exam ple given by a n bondsmen under their control. other great French P hilosopher, in T his state of affairs had been applying this method to esthetics, brought about gradually, and by m orals, and religion in his works: the sam e law th at is bringing about L ’a rt au point de vue sociologique the sam e condition today— the law (A rt from a sociological point of of the “ survival of the fittest,” the view by M. G uyau.) law of cunning and of brute force. In all the higher educational in This law of brutes evidently will stitu tio n s of Sw itzerland there are courses in political economy, theo not be the stan d ard when men be retical and applied. The U niver come civilized. It will be succeed sities of Geneva and Bern only ed by the survival of the moral offer a course in Sociology, prop and social best . Then rath e r will erly so called. At Geneva this course is given hy Professor V uarin, it be the duty of the strong to help th$ economist, well known, am ong and protect the weak—both men other works, h y his colaboration of tally and physically. If America the Revue d ’ Economie politique,' had not been discovered and opened directed by M. Gide. At Bern the up, thereby giving great o p portuni course in Sociology is given by Dr. Ludwig Stein, professor of philso- ties to the poor and the landless phy. Besides philophic studies, M. class, in what way would they have Stein has written a large work: Die been able to have released th em sociale Frage im Lichte der Philos selves from their thralldom of pov ophic, which one only need glance erty? Now, as then, the m aster’s through to gain an idea of the bold ly reform itory, but alw ays evolu greed is never satiated, but their cry tionary, spirit of his sociological is for more and more, continually ; teachings. and like a falling body, the further W hile rejecting for future society it goes the greater its velocity, so the collectivism which seems to him now, with like m om entum , are the too sudden a leap to find a place in the evolution of hum anity, he grand aggregations of w ealth build seeks a synthesis between equality ing up. and liberty, and believes it possible And yet in the face of the vast to a ttain it by means of the socializa aggregations of capital with their tion of rights, the m onopolizing by the state of all the new productive tru sts and tariffs th a t have grown forces (products of the m ines [sous- up in this country in the last few sol], waterpower, etc.) and hy a years, and the enorm ous power system of production based in part th a t they com m and by which a few on private property strongly con men are able to dictate the finances trolled, in p art on collective proper ty, the whole destined to end in a of the whole couutry, and make higher type of the individual aud and unm ake prices, careers and of h u m anity. business at w ill—“ B eginner” can’t The principal science auxiliary to see but th a t we are still on the high the social sciences, statistics, which is ra th e r a scientific method th au a road to an up-buildimz of the lower science, is also tau g h t in most of classes I Let him visit our sweat- I shops, overcrowded in every city. our uuiversities. Let him attend strikes in full blast he happens to be cunning, or to arid learn th a t those strikes are not know som ething th a t is of vital im to enable workers to get rich, but portance to the hum an fam ily ? to get bread for the hungry homes T hat he can establish no toll gate of the over-w orked and under-fed and m ake all pay endless trib u te poor. Let him see how the mines, who are in need of what he has a p the farms, ranches, lum bering and propriated ? I say to you, No ! railroads are m ade to pay our m as For the thought of man belongs ters by constant s w e a t, ignorance to men, and should be a> free as air and degradation J and then the to his fellow-man. Like the air, thousands— nay m illions, who ca n the value of intellect is im m easu ra not get enough work or m eans to ble. We can only ju stly pay for the time and labor in applying it. live, and so perish m iserably! Let “ B eginner” be silent till he He who discovers how to propagate can get eyes to see facts. The eyes a new variety of fru it—apples, he has have been blinded by read peaches, or potatoes, is just as great ing political capitalistic newspapers, a benefactor to the world as the and silly books on “ political econo m an, who by his intellect reduces m y.” Then his talk about the cre or traps the m an who reduces, the ation of wealth by the intellect of cheapness of the m eans of a produc Man aud society the rich I Bah ! Such nonsense ! tion of steel. The laborer and the genius of the m ust be ever and ju stly protected craftsm an have created all the against the. cunning and violence wealth of the world. According to of intellect as much or more th an “ Beginner’s” own statem ent in the against physical violence, for they Carnegie case, this is plain enough, are far more dangerous. for he says th a t C arnegie’s ability I know th a t this may be hard laid in the fact th a t he knew how for my friend “ B eginner” to un d er to select and use able men as co stan d , because he seems a believer workers. We are told th a t he in the law of the rig h t of discovery. cheaply secured the ta le n t, the He thinks th a t if a m an finds any ability of a Germ an chem ist, who thing, th a t it is his. I suppose • process gave J him the secret of * » his th a t he is angry and his “ blood how to make steel cheaper, then by boils” again, when he thinks th a t cunning, shooting, and low wages, Columbus and his heirs ought, “ by he got control of other skilled and right of discovery” to have a clear good workmen, and hence his field and a perfect title to all A m er ica—“ to have and to hold for ever?” wealth ! Now, sir ! In all fairness, I ask No, my dear sir, this wont do. you, if according to your theory We m ust protect the w’eak as against th a t a m an is entitled to the inven- 1 the strong intellectually as well as tion or discovery of his mind and physically. You have no more the work of his hands, was not this right to take away a m an’s means G erm an, this laborer under C arne of a livelihood by cunning of in te l gie, entitled to the wealth he pro lect, no more than you have by duced, instead of C arnegie? And physical force. The law of our then this is what m akes your “ blood land denies you the right of brute boil” is it? Because the people force to take away w hat an o th er wont bow and cring and craw l to a m an has worked for, earned or cre m an who by his own confession ated for his living, and when we had no genius or ability of his own, become civilized it will deny you but had the legal power to m ake a the right to do it by intellectual forceful hiring of some who had, cunning or the power of your law. aud could produce w hat you call C entral Point, Ore., M arch 12, 302. His wealth thereby. Such was the ability of this great hero of yours ! “ B e g in n e r’’ Leads to S o cialism ? W hat is it really ? Let me label it for you by the modest nam e. It E ditor T orch of R eason : In the article ag ain st Socialism , was sim ply uncousciousable, selfish cunning ! T hat is a ll—just ability in T orch of March 6, “ B eginner” (1) Argues, “ th a t the progress oi enough to take advantage of some the class at the foot has been and one elses’ circum stances. But now I am going to expose the will be enevitably upw ard.” G ra n t m orality of forceful cunning, on a ing th a t this is true, is it an arg u higher pedestal— th a t of our com- m ent against socialism ? Let us see. He p o rtray s tr u th mon hum anity, or “ socialism ,” if you prefer th a t name. Did you fully the condition of the “ bond ever hear th at all men are brothers th ra lls ” a few centuries ago. T h at and m ust rise or fall together ? m ilder servitude when the “ serfs of T h at there is no such ju st thing as the soil” were not allowed to leave one man building himself up at the the estate where they were born, expense of his country and his fel was one step upw ard. “ Later, the low-man? T hat he who would be masses could go where they pleas a beuefactor, or even a ju s t m an, ed,” and had “ as much freedom as m ust give the thoughts of his brain, was com patible with h ered itary no given him by nature and h u m an i bility com prising lawgivers by b irth . “ Still la te r” he says, “ came ‘tr i ty, to his fellow-man f r e e ! Free as the air we breath ! T h at he has u m p h an t dem ocracy’,” and he pic no hum an right to make a selfish tures triu m p h a n tly the great prog monopoly of his intellect because ress dem ocracy has m ade possible