Image provided by: Silverton Country Historical Society; Silverton, OR
About Torch of reason. (Silverton, Oregon) 1896-1903 | View Entire Issue (Sept. 29, 1898)
TOBCH OF VOL. 2. L earn of N atu re. SILVERTON, OREGON, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1898. NO. 38. the fountain of (be Godhead. The Problem of R eligious C o n tra d ic a t e ancient, the witnesses are dead, H oly Ghost issues from the Son, tio n s . but their w ritings rem ain .” R E V IS E D FOR T H E TO RCH . ___ because in the Godhead there is “ Be it so,’’ replied the legislator, BY C. F. VOLXEY. ' v T o i I L E pondering o ’er th e <” )ly one beginning, one cause, by “ but if they contradict each other, Y* , W m an y creeds, it seem ed which all th a t is in the Godhead is Chiefs ami doctors of m ankind ! who shall reconcile th em ?” V h-iC-t- < » A changing scene ap- pro()uced f ,,. * * * N ' peared as if I d ream ed, «-tv. n u w , You rem ark how the nations, living “.Just judge,” cried one of the H em m ed in w ith strong i f w e attem p t to give some definite apart, have hitherto followed dif stan d ard s, “ the proof th a t our wit- and tow ering walls m eaning to the words Ghost, F attier, th ere rang ferent palhs, each believing its own have seen the tru th is, th a t A voice of m illions as they loudly san g : S on, G odhead, fountain, issue, im they died to confirm iCT and our “ St. 1’e te r is o u r rock, we can n o t f a il; to be that of tru th . If. however, age, resting, power, reflected, per ’G ain st us th e gates of hell can n o t p re faith is sealed by th e blood of sonal product, m outh, connection, I lr u th is one, and opinions are vari- vail. m arty rs.” We say in words w h at o th ers say in it will im m ediately appear th a t the j oup’ evident that some are in deeds, “ And ours, too,” said the other such vast num bers •Our creed is rig h t, h u t w rong all o th er whole becomes mere sound, unpic-j e rro r‘ stan d ard s; “ we have thousands of c re ed s.’ turahle in thought. The reasoning, i aie in the wrong, who shall This is o u r th em e, our never-ceasing m artyrs w h o have died in the m ost also, is som ething astounding. A drtre ,o SH.V, I am in the right ? ’ song, excruciating torm ents, w it bout ever ‘O ur ch u rch is r ig h t; o u r c h u rch was Begin, therefore, by being indulgent issues from B because there is only never w ro n g .’ ” denying the tru th .” Let us all one b e g in n in g in C. A gain, A is in your dissensions. Then the C h ristian s of every sect, The scene was changed, a n d o th er Œe personal product of B, belong- <r»«h « . if tbe Io(Jiani) |h e th ro n g s were nigh, Each p arty fenced in walls both strong C ing to, but not out of D, because it ,e •’!>' n ‘o,,!' " | ," cl' t0 «»«s _ «lay j Hpane8e> q{ and h igh. produces F. h a \e governed the world, oiiginat- Each m u ltitu d e on teachers did depend, is E which produces confessors, m artyrs, penitents, etc. Who w alked th e walls each fortress to All this inde finite. unthinkable ing from chance, propagated in ob Ar.d one of these parties, having defend. , Alas! w hat clashing creeds w ith erro r l a n g u a g e , p e r f e c tly u se le s s fo r a n y scurity, adm itted ' w ithout discus denied the m artyrology of the frau ght intellectual purpose, is most efliea- sion, accredited by a love of novel others: “ W ell,” said they, “ we will W hat hase tra d itio n s from th e pagans and im itation, have usurped brought! " | cious in the production of emotion. ty .. • . . , , then die ourselves to prove the A las! w hat tru stin g dupes th e teachers During ihe time these worthy th o th e.r em pire in a clandestine man-1 | n | , h <)f our le d ! And in stan tly a crowd of men, A h! w hat vile, unclean food to flocks lo g ian s w ere s ittin g in in c u b a tio n ner. It is time, if they are well was fed founded, to give a solemn stam p to of every religion and of every sect, over this production, nothing could And y et, from every p a rty rolled the exceed, no doubt, in volume Ihe their certainty, and legitimize their presented them selves to suffer the song, Let us summon them torm ent8 of d e a th - M any even he- “ O u r c h u rc h is r ig h t; o u r ch u rch was ! em otional flow of awe a n d sole m- existence. • i . . y . , let. J i gan • to , tear , their , arm n ev er w rong. . . . . . to a g en eral . s c ru tin , s, ’ and to . , heat . , nity, and in this result we recognize tins <lav " , their heads and breasts, w ithout The scene w as c h a n g e d ; I saw before me 41 , A • ,i . i , gtan(1 6 its theological use. In theological each piopound his creed, let the discovering any sym ptom of pain, One w ithout open bible in his h a n d . language such a m ixture of mi- whole assem bly be the judge, and j But the legislator, preventing W ith e a rn e st face from N a tu re ’s book i „.„„ j . „ h i « i- tie read ; th in k a b , le w o rd s is called h ig h , let th a t alone he acknowledged as them —“ 0 , m e n !’’ said he, “ hear my words with patience. I f you And th en in tones of flrrnness spoke and holy and m ysterious tru th .” We true which is so for the whole die to prove t h a t two and two make “ I read from out this book not writ by | sb o u ld a lw a y B b,-a r f i n d that h u m a n race. four, will your death add anyth in g Then, by order of position, the to this tru th ? ” m an , this word “ t r u t h ” has a very differ- “ No,” answered all. nrrnr 1 ' e n ’ m e a n in g in theology from w h at representative of the first stan d ard vi I’M I f..r, <111 • “ And if you die to prove th a t ’M idst all th is din, w hat better<‘an we do j it h a s in science. In science tru th on the left was allowed to speak. they m ake five, will th a t make T han read am i search th is volum e i „ . . . . . . “ You are not perm itted to doubt,” through and through? | " ieanB a M atem en l g iv in g a co rrect them five ? ” said th eir chief, “ th at our doctrine It teaches us alw ays to live a rig h t, representation of facts; in theology Again they all answered, “ No.” And e ’e r sh u n cruel s u p e rs titio n ’s night. ! t r u t h m e a n s a s t a t e m e n t s u p p o s e d is the only true and infallible one. “ W hat, then, is your persuasion ' sotm-11' ln- n t v r 't.i.iiig | O pe jn accordance with the reve- F irst, it is revealed by God him- to prove, if it changes not the ex- N atu re is r ig h t; h e r teach in g s never lation “ accepted” and the creed self—” istence of things? Truth is one w rong. “clung to. ’ In fact, theology and “So is o u rs,” cried all the other your persuasions are various; m any . . . . I of you, therefore are in error. Now science do not speak tin* same la n stan d ard s, and you are not per- ¡j man> a g jg evident, can persuade guage T heological R easo n ing. T his fact, if remembered, will ex- m itted to doubt it.” him self of error, what is the per- by JOHN w il s o n . plain m any things w hich otherwise “ But at least,” said the legislator, | suasion of man to prove? In the year 1875 there assem bled are not to accounted for. A “you m ust prove it, for we can not “ I f error has its m arty rs, what a num ber’ of ecclesiastics in Bonn ’¡1<‘ol,, 'gT ' 7 ' ' 1.1 a PI'‘"-en. faith in believe w hat we do not know .” is the sure criterion of tru th ? .1 n u m o c r OI CCGICPIMSUUH Hl jm h iii . the trllth of jlls statem ents, pro- u . . . „ “ If the evil spirit works m iracles, The object of their meeting was to claim s to his hearers th a t an infi- O ur doctrine is proved, rep lied wh a t is the distinctive character of find a solution to the question, How nitely good God has prepared two the first stan d ard , “ by num erous God? can the differences in the creeds places — one of torture and one of facts, hv a m ultitude of m iracles, “ Besides, why resort forever to “ clung t o ” by the E astern and delight. Into the first he has de- by resurrections of the dead, by incom plete and insufficient mir- Instead of changing the Western churches be so adjusted U ™ ofethe°hum 7n'race,' and ¡"nto rivers d r‘(ed UP> G mountains re- acles? course of nature, why not rath e r as to allow a practical reconcile- the second a select few. D uring moved — change opinions? W hy m urder nient? These grave theologians eternity the m ajority will be gnash- “ And we also have num berless and terrify men, instead of in stru ct spent m any days in solemn prayer ’’ig th eir teeth with anguish, while m iracles,” cried all the others, and ing and correcting them ? “ O, credulous hut opinionated and m editation and in deep confer- ’,.1® fe? i ’111. 6® th « praises each began to recount the most in- m ortals I none of uh know what ence together. No doubt th e flow ¡nfinHe goodliet*. If we fo„ ow the ^ b l e things. was done yesterday, w hat is doing of em otion was copious, all of them preacher and his hearers home Ih e ,r nJ,racle8» sa,d the first today even under our eyes; and we feeling the im mense im portance and from the church, we shall find them stan d ard , “ are im aginary, or the swear to w h at was done two thou the trem endous responsibility of ’n half an hour a t lunch, eating fictions of the evil spirit, who has sand years a g o ! their position. The results o f'th eir a,.'d .d rin l‘i" 8 an d («»ghing over delude.! them .” ”Oh the weakness and yet th e united efforts were at length com- fp 'olc.us Kr.w ,p Did we im agine <.Tlley are yours,” said the others, p n d e of men ! 1 he laws of n atu re imiieu en n s r i gui co the preacher and his hearers to be- u , J v «re unchangeable and profound — m unicated to the world, and among Reve, in the scientific sense, in the a * ar< im aginary; ami each our Injn(j s are full of illusion and these we find the following lan- tru th of these statem ents, what we gr°up, speaking of itself, cried out: frivolity — and yet we would com- guage, em bodying the conclusion “l,<H,ld conclude would be th a t they “ None hut ours are tru e; all the prebend everything — determ ine they arrived at as to the origin and all, be P1« " « '''1 *""> inconsol- others are false.” everything ! Forgetting th a t it is s “ H oly Ghost ” -T h a t i ' ' 1" a " <J,t<-rr<’r- Bu‘ how dif‘ The legislator (hen asked, “ H ave ®a"!er for «b« » b °>« b» m aa n atu re of the 11 ferent from this, a* we have seen, .. . c be in error, th an to change the na- th e H oly ( ihost issues from the i* t h e a c tu a i f a c t! — [T h o u g h ts on 5 ° “ 1’vir.g w itnesses of the facts ? tUre of theiiinalleat atom.”—{Ruins F ath er, as the beginning, the cause, j Science. , “ No,” replied they all; “ the facts of Em pires.