opinion
s
°US./4
Draft, anyone?
IMDUCTIO*/
What if there was a war and nobody came?
That’s obviously the question some politicians, who
want to reinstate the draft, are asking.
You say you’re free, American and between the ages
of 18 and 26, and you haven’t heard anything about the
reinstatement of the draft?
Obviously, some politicians want to keep you in the
dark.
There are a few senate and house bills before the
United States Congress, right now, that are asking for
some form of draft reinstatement in the United States.
One such house bill proposes a National Youth Ser
vice Draft. It was introduced on Feb. 15 in part by
California Rep. Pete McClusky. This bill would give an
option to anyone (women included) between the ages
of 18 and 26 to serve two years in the military, one year
of civilian service, or take a chance on the draft lottery.
Is this a case of “you’re damned if you do, and you’re
damned if you don’t?”
Opponents of the current all-volunteer military say
that the resources of men and the quality of enlistees
are dwindling. There aren’t enough people enlisting.
Another con to the all-volunteer military is the cost
factor of advertising materials to recruit the number of
people needed to serve.
Proponents of the all-volunteer military argue that
registration for wartime mobilization is a threat, not a
reality. They believe that the next war of size will be
fought with nuclear arms, not over a period of several
months with rifles and tanks.
It appears that we’re not being told about the bills. If
gradual introduction is at play here, then someone is
guessing wrongly about the integrity of American
youth.
Find out the answers to your questions now. Will
there be college deferment? Will women be drafted?
What will be the age limit on draftees?
Tell your congressmen how you feel about conscrip
tion. Write them and tell them that’ you agree or
disagree with the draft lottery system.
Don’t let the draft slip back in with no input from the
ones most affected by it. If you do, don’t be surprised
when your letter comes.
C.B.
K api P us
K ui P s
* LAB
*
A nimals
care
(AS
J
N ot
-THe«?
IN
A& xat
CAPTI U i T^
XT’S
feedback
To the Editor:
What began as the
Oregon
Cattlemen’s
Association’s rebuttal to an
article written by Malheur
Field Station Director.
Denzel Ferguson, dealing
with public grazing has
evolved into an attempt to
change the entire concept
of the institution. The OCA
originally felt that state
funds should be withheld
sprint
19600 S. MollallaAvenue, Oregon City. Oregon 97045
Offices: Trailer B; telephone: 656*1631. ext. 309 or 310
editor Cyndi Bacon * news editor Scott Starnes
arts editor Leanne Lally * sports editor Mark McNeary
photo editor Kelly Laughlin * staff writers Happte Thacker,
Mike Koller, Elena Vancil, Brenda Nolan,
Don Ives, Steve McPherson, Tommy Clark,
Ramona Isackson, James Rhoades, Brian Rood
staff photographersGreg Klenrie, Charlie Wagg,
Pat Carlson * cartoonist Mary Cuddy * graphic designer Bev Boston
production manager Janet Vockrodt
busineas manager Mark Barnhill * professional adviser Surie Boes
The Print, a member of the Oregon Newspaper Publishers
Association, aims to be fair and impartial Journalistic medium
covering the campus community as thoroughly as possible. Opinions
expressed In The Print do not necessarily reflect those the CCC ad
ministration, faculty or the Associated Student Government.
/
Page 2
from the station unless
Ferguson was fired, feeling
that he had undue influen-
ce on those attending or
visiting the complex. More
recently the finger has also
been pointed at the station
as a whole.
Ferguson does not at
tempt to use the station as
a podium to air his views to
any and all who stay there.
He has done an excellent
job of directing a very sue«
cessful summer program
making it one of the finest
field stations in the coun*
try. To visiting groups he is
quick to recommend poin
ts of interest, not points to
ponder. As for students at
tending classes, there is
very little time for personal
interaction and most of it
with their respective in
structors. If the argument
is directed toward Fer-
guson’s
grazing stand
point, the issue, if indeed
there is one, should be set
tled by direct personal
communication with those
involved and not with an the lack ot interest and j
communication I
extreme measure that presssed by those who!
would have far reaching been involved with]
and detrimental effects to station. A hearing for]
any person wishing to use proposed bill to withl
Malheur Field Station for state funding is to]
research, education or reviewed by the Orel
recreation.
State Legislature Marell
There is absolutely no The main point of con]
reason why a single vested is that the proponent!
interest group should be the bill have money, I
and I
able to impose a change in influence,
policy on an institute that vigorously lobbying
provides outstanding op Salem. The outlook,III
portunities for in-depth encouraging. What
studies on unique physical needed are letters to I
Senator I
and biological features. local
The ranchers believe that Representative, with!
the station is not "com bon copies sent to I
patible with the area” and House Ways and Ml
that the education is not Committee. A call toll
• handled properly in that individuals would be jus]
the teaching is done in a effective. Your suppt
as soon
“biased manner.” The fact needed
* is that the objectives of the possible.
ReedSM
courses deal with ic-
■ thyology, geology x and Eastern Oregon ®
College M
hotography; not environ
POBosj
mental politics.
_i
La
Grande,
ORI
I am appalled to learn of
Clackamas Community Col