Vernonia's voice. (Vernonia, OR) 2007-current, July 03, 2014, Page 6, Image 6

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    6
in other words
july3
2014
Ask a Lawyer
By Steven Leskin
Q~ 
What is a fiduciary?
A~ 
There  is  a  lot  of  confusion 
about  what  a  fiduciary  is  and  what  a 
fiduciary can do. To explain the term, I 
want to start with a legal concept called 
“agency.” Agency is a contract principal. 
There  are  two  parties  to  an  agency 
contract: the principal and the agent. An 
agent acts on behalf of the principal. The 
agent can only act within the scope of his 
or her agency. The scope of the agency is 
determined by the two parties.
 
For example, a real estate agent 
works for either the buyer or the seller. 
The agency can make and accept offers 
to  sell  a  home.  The  ability  to  make  or 
accept  an  offer  is  within  the  scope  of 
the  agent’s  authority.  The  agent  cannot 
make  an  offer  above  what  he  or  she 
is  authorized  to  make  by  the  seller. 
The  agent  owes  the  principal  a  duty  of 
loyalty, in other words, in the real estate 
setting,  the  agent  could  not  work  for 
both the buyer and seller. Any decisions 
made by the agent are made within the 
scope of the agreed agency relationship.
 
A  fiduciary  is  a  type  of 
agency.  Someone  who  has  a  fiduciary 
responsibility  can  make  decisions  on 
behalf  of  someone  else.  Unlike  an 
Vernonia
Veterinary Clinic
Small and Large Animals
Now Open
Mon, Wed & Saturday
9 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Call for Appointments
(503) 429-1612
Or 24 hr. Emergency Number (503) 397-6470
700 Weed Ave. Vernonia, OR
agent, a fiduciary has to act with the best 
interest of the principal and the decisions 
the fiduciary makes must be objectively 
reasonable and free of any personal gain. 
For  example,  a  fiduciary  relationship 
might exist when a child takes care of an 
elderly or mentally incompetent parent. 
The child could decide where the parent 
lives,  where  and  when  to  sell  a  house, 
or what social services are appropriate to 
the parent. 
 
Fiduciary  does  not  mean 
financial. A fiduciary relationship might 
be  imposed  as  a  matter  of  law,  eg,  a 
conservator, or it might develop over the 
course of a relationship. There are very 
few  fiduciary  relationships  in  business. 
Most business relationships are agencies 
relationships. 
Q~ 
I  got  a  speeding  ticket.  I  went 
to court and brought with me a printout 
showing  that  my  speedometer  was 
incorrectly  measuring  my  speed.  It 
was about ten percent to slow. When it 
said  I  was  going  55  mph,  I  was  really 
going closer to 68 mph. Why was I still 
convicted of speeding if the speedometer 
was  wrong  and  I  could  prove  that  the 
speedometer was malfunctioning?
A~ 
This  a  deeper  issue  than  it 
appears and gets to the heart of criminal 
law.
 
In order to be guilty of a crime, 
there must be both an intention and an 
act. The best example is a pre meditated 
murder.  In  pre  meditated  murder,  a 
person  plans  and  kills  someone.  If  the 
killing was in a fit of rage or happened 
as the result of carelessness, then there 
is  less  intent,  though  there  is  still  an 
action that resulted in someone’s death. 
Since  the  intent  to  kill  is  considered  a 
more heinous crime, it is punished more 
severely.
 
When a driver does not conform 
his  or  her  driving  to  the  motor  vehicle 
code, it is considered a violation of law, 
not a misdemeanor or felony. A violation 
of law does not require an intent. What 
matters  with  the  motor  vehicle  code  is 
that a driver observes the code, not that 
he or she intends to or not. For example, 
if someone runs a stop sign, it is not a 
Columbia Humane Society
featured Pet
Molly is a very sweet little girl that will
make someone a great pet. She gets
along great with other dogs and seems
to not mind cats either. Molly is very
playful. She is right around 2 years old.
Her adoption fee is $165.00, if you have
any questions please don't hesitate to
call 503-397-4353 or email.
Email:
animalwelfare@columbiahumane.org
Phone: 503-397-4353
Web: www.columbiahumane.org
2084 Oregon Street, St. Helens, OR 97051
defense to say, I intended to stop the car. 
The only act that is required is the action 
to  stop  the  car  in  response  to  the  stop 
sign.
 
It is the same thing with violating 
the  speed  limit.  It  does  not  matter  how 
fast you intended to drive your car, it only 
matters how fast your car was going. It 
is not relevant for a conviction that you 
intended to observe the speed limit. The 
proof that you had that the speedometer 
was incorrect only confirms that your car 
was traveling too fast and that you were 
violating the motor vehicle code.
Q~ 
What’s the hardest case you ever 
tried?
A~ 
Several  years  ago,  an  attorney 
friend  in  Eastern  Oregon  called  and  he 
asked me to take a case of his. Bill was 
a  down-winder.  He  was  born  blind  and 
suffered  various  cancers  most  of  his 
life.  His  health  was  never  good.  When 
Bill asked for a favor, it was always the 
better part of grace to say yes.
 
The case he had for me involved 
an  immigrant  family  who  bought  some 
property in Ontario. I forget how much 
they  purchased,  but  it  might  have  been 
about a hundred acres. The family then 
hired  a  local  farmer  to  farm  the  land. 
They  had  a  common  sharecropping 
arrangement.    The  landowner  paid  for 
the seed and chemicals, the water and the 
mortgage on the land.  The sharecropper 
farmer supplied the labor and equipment. 
If I recall correctly, the farmer received 
one third of the gross receipts from the 
sale of the crop.
 
The  problem  came  at  harvest 
time  when  everyone  was  settling  up. 
As  it  happened,  the  sharecropper  had 
multiple  accounts  with  several  co-
ops.  When  crops  came  in  from  the 
landowner, they were transported to one 
of  the  co-ops.    However,  once  a  truck 
containing  the  crop  left  the  farm,  there 
was no proof where the crop came from. 
And, once the crop was delivered to the 
co-op, there was no way to prove where 
the crop came from, except by what the 
drivers told the co-op. 
 
When it came time to settle up, 
the landowner received a very small sum. 
The  farmer,  who  had  multiple  farms, 
received  a  lot  of  money  from  various 
sources.    It  was  impossible  to  account 
for the crops which left the landowners 
property.
 
It  turns  out  that  the  main  street 
in town was named after the farmer.  It 
turned  out  that  the  farmer’s  daughter 
worked  in  the  court  house.  It  turns  out 
that  the  farmer  had  dealings  with  most 
of the members of the jury pool. (To the 
courts  credit,  they  forbid  the  daughter 
from  working  on  the  case,  and  brought 
in a judge from out of the county.) And, 
it also turned out that the landowner had 
an attorney from Portland (me).
 
The  landowner  had  kept  notes 
on  the  number  of  trucks  leaving  his 
property and the crops.  He knew about 
how  much  potatoes  should  have  come 
off  each  acre  of  his  land.  However,  he 
just  did  not  have  sufficient  proof  to 
convince  a  jury.  And,  further,  he  was 
sued  by  the  sharecropping  farmer  for 
lost  profits  when  he  ended  the  contract 
before the end of the growing season.
 
The  landowner  lost  because 
he  did  not  have  sufficient  evidence  to 
prove  with  reasonable  certainty  how 
much  money  he  lost-  his  calculations 
were  considered  speculative.  Despite 
proving in court that the suit against the 
landowner was based on fabricated data, 
the landowner still lost. He was required 
to pay the sharecropper money.
 
This  one  case  has  always 
bothered  me  as  a  profound  injustice. 
The  landowners  were  required  to 
declare  bankruptcy.  I  think  the  courts 
failed.  Going  to  court  is  always  a  risk, 
and  the  results  are  never  certain.  And, 
some times the historical reality of what 
actually  happened  is  far  different  than 
what results at trial.
Steven Leskin is an attorney in North
Portland. He has been in practice since
1992. You can submit a question to him
through www.ModestMeansLawOffice.
com or through the Vernonia’s  Voice
website.
The Next Vernonia Area Chamber of Commerce Meeting
will be held at West Oregon Electric
652 Rose Avenue
Tuesday, July 8 at 6:30 PM
TOO BUSY?
Call your LOCAL bookkeeper
R
Y
OLL
A
P
PLUS LLC
Edi Sheldon 503-429-1819
edisheldon@gmail.com
Licensed tax consultant • Full service payroll
Personal & small business bookkeeping • QuickBooks assistance
CORPS, S-CORPS, LLC, Partnerships • Personal one-on-one service
LTC #29629 - Oregon licensed tax consultant
RTRP #P00448199 - designated as a registered tax return preparer by the Internal Revenue Service
The IRS does not endorse any particular individual tax return preparer. For more information
on tax return preparers, go to www.IRS.gov.