Vernonia's voice. (Vernonia, OR) 2007-current, June 28, 2011, Page 3, Image 3

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    from the editor
An Opinion: Same Old Song and Dance
By Scott Laird
 
504  to  84.      Those  were  the 
official numbers in the recall election  for 
Vernonia City Councilor Kevin Hudson.  
 
83%  of  the  people  who  voted 
said  they  didn’t  want  Kevin  Hudson  to 
represent them anymore.
 
If you divide 504 by 84 it equals 
exactly  6.    By  a  margin  of  six  to  one, 
voters said they were unhappy with the 
decisions  Hudson  has  been  making  on  
their behalf.
 
52.6%  of  registered  voters 
returned their ballots in this election.
 
Those  numbers  are  facts,  and 
facts don’t lie.
 
Those  facts  should  have  sent  a 
clear and concise message to  Councilors 
Willow  Burch  and  Marilyn  Nicks--the 
recall election was not just a  reflection 
on Hudson’s performance and decisions, 
it was a reflection on all three of them.  
People are  paying attention and  they are 
extremely unhappy. 
 
The  citizens  are  sending  these 
Councilors a message.  
 
  Is  that  message    getting 
through?    Apparently  not.    Burch  and 
Nicks showed no intention of changing 
their  tune  last  week,  acting  as  if  the 
Hudson  recall  hadn’t  even  taken  place.  
Votes they cast on critical city decisions 
showed    they  are  still  uninterested  in 
listening to the majority,  and only intend 
to do whatever it takes to push forward 
their personal agenda.  They have to be 
recalled.
 
Last  week  Council  failed  to 
reach  a  decision  in  two  important 
issues  facing  them—splitting  the  vote 
on  naming  a  replacement  Councilor 
for  Hudson’s  vacated  seat,    and  then 
delaying any decision about hiring a City 
Administrator  after  completing  a  day 
of  interviews  with  two  applicants  and 
reaching no agreement to offer either of 
them a contract.  
 
No  decision  was  reached  on 
two  critical issues  and  no  progress  was 
made  to  move  city  business  forward.  
But possibly even worse, even after the 
Hudson recall,   Burch or Nicks showed 
no  remorse  for  the  damage  they  have 
caused to pur community.  Did they admit 
that they may have misjudged what the 
citizen  expect from them?   Did Burch 
or  Nicks  appear  introspective  in  any 
way--that    they  were  re-examining  any 
of their  decisions? Did they do anything 
that  might  persuade  those  considering 
a  recall  to  change  their  minds?    The 
answer is clearly, No. 
 
The Hudson recall election was 
an  opportunity  for  all  of  us  to  take  the 
pulse  of  our  community,  to  get  a  sense 
of  whether  the  citizens  approved  or 
disapproved of the direction our elected 
officials have been taking us for the last 
five  months.  To  me  the  message  was 
clear.
 
Personally    I  have  been  very 
outspoken about recent decisions by our 
City Council.  I know if the results of the 
Hudson election had been reversed, with 
over 80% of voters expressing approval 
for  Hudson’s  performance,    I  would 
certainly  be  reconsidering  my  stance.  
If the election results had been reversed 
you  would  be  reading  a  very  different 
article right now.
 
Maybe I misunderstood what was 
really  happening?    Maybe  I  misjudged 
the  mood  of  the  community?    Maybe  I 
need to rethink my position?   
 
Not Burch and Nicks.  They still 
don’t get it. 83% of the people voting to 
recall Hudson means nothing to them.
 
When  Council  met  on  June 
21st    to  try  to  select  a  replacement 
Councilor for Hudson’s  seat, they were 
hoping  to  make  an  appointment  so  the  
new  Councilor  could  participate  in  the 
next  two important upcoming business 
decisions:  selection  of  the  permanent 
City  Administrator    and  the  second 
Due  Process  Hearing  for  Mike  Kay, 
scheduled  for  Monday  June  27.    Two 
critical  decisions  that  are  being  closely 
watched by the community and have the 
potential to be controversial.  
 
  Here  was  a  chance  for  Burch 
and  Nicks  to  show  they  were  willing 
to  work  together  with  the  rest  of  their 
Council.    To  show  the  community  that 
they  got  the  message  the  voters  sent 
when they recalled Hudson by a  6 to 1 
margin.    To  show  they  understood  that 
the majority strongly disagree with their 
previous decisions.  
 
After  the  interviews  and 
discussion, Councilors Burch and Nicks 
chose Victoria  Peters  as  their  choice  to 
replace Hudson.  In my opinion, Peters 
is  someone  who  potentially  has  a  lot 
to  offer  our  community,  she  is  just  not 
qualified and lacks the experience to be a 
City Councilor right now, especially with 
all the big decisions looming around the 
corner. 
 
Councilors  Randy  Parrow  and 
Mayor  Josette  Mitchell  chose  Brett 
Costley,  who  had  previously  served  on 
the City Planning Commission and was 
elected twice to City Council and served  
for  ten  years.    Costley  wasn’t  even 
Burch’s  second  choice.    Costley,  who  
stepped down as City Councilor last year 
to devote more time to his family, said in 
his interview that he had applied at the 
request  of  numerous  citizens  who  had 
asked him to step back up and help.  
 
Loads  of  city    government 
experience  versus  no  experience?    A 
twice  elected  official  with  community 
backing  versus  someone  who  is 
virtually  unknown?  Someone  who  can 
hit  the  ground  running  versus  someone 
who  would  need  training  and  time  to 
understand the nuances of how the city 
functions?
 
But  there  we  were—at  a 
deadlock.    Councilor  Parrow  asked 
his  colleagues  to  make  a  decision  that 
was  best  for  the  citizens  of  Vernonia.  
Councilors Burch and  Nicks refused to 
back down.  
 
Councilor  Burch,  who  is 
becoming  quite  infamous  for  making 
outrageous and inflammatory statements 
in  public,  once  again  didn’t  disappoint,  
getting off a handful of them, including 
this zinger and showing her true colors:
 
“If  I  change  my  vote  to  Brett 
Costley and we bring him in, then Randy 
will be happy and you [Mayor Mitchell] 
will be happy because the majority vote 
will  then  bring  Bill  Haack  back  and  is 
that  what  we’re  all  sitting  here  for—is 
that the deal?” 
 
Apparently,  for  Burch,  this 
decision about who to appoint to Council 
really  came  down  to  making  sure  that 
previous  Interim  City  Administrator 
Haack    doesn’t  survive  the  interview 
and hiring process.  Burch voted to fire 
Haack in May but then agreed he should 
be  given  a  fair,  impartial  and  unbiased 
interview  and  chance  to  win  back  his 
job.    It  sounded  to  me  like  she  had 
already made up her mind.
 
  Councilor Parrow again offered 
Nicks a chance to change her vote.  Here 
was  her  chance  to  compromise,    and 
work  with  the  rest  of  the  Council.    To 
start the healing she says she wants for 
our  community.    Not  surprisingly,    she 
declined, staying true to Burch,  as she 
has in every important Council decision 
she has made so far.  Toe the party line, 
don’t  vote  against  the  block,  keep  the 
agenda moving forward and safe.
 
So  no  decision  was  reached.  
Council  did  decide  to  re-interview 
Costley  and  Peters  on  Friday  June  24, 
but  of  course  they  couldn’t  reach  an 
agreement then either.  Burch and Nicks 
stood their ground and blocked progress.  
This  was  after  the  City  Administrator 
interviews,  where  not  surprisingly 
the  four  Councilors  could  not  reach  a 
majority  decision  as  well.    On  June  24 
Councilor  Nicks  again  asked  for  more 
time to consider the Council appointment 
decision,  and  Council  agreed  to  revisit 
it  again  on  Monday  June  27,  the  same 
evening they will consider the Kay case, 
which  will  also  be  heard  by  only  the 
four Councilors.    I wonder if Burch has 
already  made  up    her  mind  about  that 
issue as well?
 
One other thing about Councilor 
Nicks.    For  the  City  Administrator 
interviews,  each  Councilor  was  asked 
Terry’s
Gym
HOME OF THE
2 1/4 lb.
“All In Burger”
“STILL BIKER FRIENDLY”
TRAIN LIKE A CHAMPION!
LIVE MUSIC
Friday, July 15
INBA World Champion Collin Moeller 
works out at Terry’s Gym - You can too!
• Specialty hamburgers
• Draft beer & mixed drinks
• Pool tables & satelite TV
• Special live music events
• Free Wi-fi
503-901-1705
16720 Noakes Rd.  Vernonia
Sun - Thurs 11 AM - Midnight •
733 Bridge St, Vernonia
The Third
Member
june28
2011
3
Publisher and Managing Editor
Scott Laird
503-367-0098
scott@vernoniasvoice.com
Contributors
Chip Bubl
Nick Galaday
Michal Smith
Sonia Spackman
Burt Tschache
Don Webb
Photography
Scott Laird
SCA
Want to advertise?
Contact: ads@vernoniasvoice.com
Have an article?
Contact: news@vernoniasvoice.com
One year subscriptions
(24 issues) $35
PO Box 55
Vernonia, OR 97064
503-367-0098
www.VernoniasVoice.com
to  chose  a  citizen  to  sit  on  a  panel  that 
would  interview  the  applicants  and 
offer feedback about them.  Nicks chose 
someone  from  outside  the  community, 
who  lives  in  Columbia  County,  but  is 
not  a  resident  of  Vernonia.    Someone 
who  doesn’t  pay  city  taxes,  who  won’t 
be  directly  affected  by  decisions  the 
City Administrator  will  make  and  who 
doesn’t vote for Vernonia City Council.  
She couldn’t find a qualified citizen from 
within her own constituency?
 
It  looks  like  nothing  has 
changed.    Burch  and  Nicks  are  still 
whistling the same tune.  They just don’t 
get it.  Apparently the facts of the recall 
election mean nothing to them.
 
My position has not changed as 
well.  We still need to recall Burch and 
Nicks, now more than ever. 
Vernonia
Dance
Center
Ahult Strength Builhing
anh Stretching
Mon & Weh Starts July 6
6:30-7:30 PM
Summer Dance Camp
July 18, 19 & 20
Fri - Sat 11 AM - 2:30 AM
• 503-429-9999
Call for Details
Jessica Davis (503) 429~0850