December 25, 2015 CapitalPress.com 5 Attorneys get $10.6 million in potato antitrust deal Lawyers for plaintiffs awarded 42 percent of the $25 million fund By MATEUSZ PERKOWSKI Capital Press Attorneys who fought a potato farmers’ cooperative in court over alleged price manipulation will receive more than $10.6 million for obtaining a settlement deal in the lawsuit. Earlier this year, the Unit- ed Potato Growers of Amer- LFD DQG DI¿OLDWHG FRPSDQLHV agreed to pay $25 million to resolve class action litigation brought by several grocers and consumers who claimed the cooperative unlawfully re- stricted production of the crop. Aside from the monetary award, the settlement pro- hibits UPGA from trying to control potato production for seven years. A federal judge recently approved that agreement and awarded the plaintiff’s law- yers roughly 42 percent of the settlement fund, which represents attorney fees and expenses. 7KH DZDUG LV MXVWL¿HG EH- cause the attorneys conducted a great deal of work, facing VLJQL¿FDQWULVNVDQGREWDLQHG an “excellent result” for their clients, said U.S. District Judge Lynn Winmill. Attorneys representing “direct purchasers” of pota- toes, such as grocery stores, will get about $6.43 million in fees and another $1.55 mil- lion in expenses, while those representing “indirect pur- chasers,” such as consumers, will receive $1.65 million in fees and nearly $1 million in expenses. The litigation began in 2010, when Brigiotta’s Farm- land Produce and Garden Cen- WHU ¿OHG D FRPSODLQW DJDLQVW WKH FRRSHUDWLYH DQG DI¿OLDWHG defendants for coordinating potato acreage to boost prices for the crop. Other plaintiffs soon joined the litigation. UPGA thought its efforts were shielded from anti- trust prohibitions under the Capper-Volstead Act, under which farmer cooperatives get some exemptions. However, in 2011, Win- mill found that such “collu- sive crop planning” was not covered by Capper-Volstead, which led to settlement talks that twice failed in 2012 and 2013. 7KH QHJRWLDWLRQV ¿QDOO\ bore fruit in June 2015 after WKHSODLQWLIIV¿OHGDPRWLRQWR certify their lawsuit as a class action, which allows other parties to join the litigation. In announcing the deal, UPGA maintained that it did not engage in illegal conduct and said it would continue gathering data and making recommendations even as the acreage planning program was ceased. Despite the settlement, the cooperative and other defen- dants are still defending them- selves in court because one plaintiff, Associated Whole- sale Grocers, did not join in the agreement. Barring another settle- ment, proceedings in that case are scheduled throughout next year, with expert depositions concluding in August 2016 and court documents being submitted in December 2016. Okanogan ranchers looking for grazing By DAN WHEAT Capital Press U.S. Bureau of Reclamation photo Kachess Lake, west of Cle Elum, Wash., is shown at low pool. It is RQHRI¿YHUHVHUYRLUVVHUYLQJWKH