MONDAY, OOTOBIUi 2ilT10. ' "
mi if? morrmiv
H )) , 3
L3
JO
4j
r A'' d . t
v
w v lii .
Do
You
Lvnow
7
I hat during only a few weeks circulation, 40,000 of your fellow-citizens signed
That had it been necessare of the voters would
. 7 Tr.T" -.'.,.-.,, -w....... , r., ... ....... ....... ,
nave signed Kr
workineriya ;hankers iind r business raeni
of theState? -v vu-:. -..-v.-;-. --'-.. . -a-
That it includes the names of many men who vote "dry" in their own community?
V
want
ma nronimrm
option;
nv absolulyj kills1 locaL option, and -the - people A6f Or6g6n
want a voice in tne settlement 01. tms question m tneir
own
;COimijt IIh f
Statewideiiprohibition robs youof th&t nithtJ m " lii f rr ?y ; :i
It robs jxni .01 the right to have cider, beer, or liquor; in your own home! It
ifaakes it a crinie to give your friend or neighbor, a glass of cider. : v
It permits anyhofficer, special or regular, to break opeii your door at midnight
and search your wife's or mother's room for liquor! Do you want that kind of law
inreon?
Maine,-ori September 12, 1910, repudiated its prohibitiW W 57 years' stand
ing by electing, for the first time in 30 years, a Democratic governor upon his pledge
to re-submit the constitutional prohibition law. It was not political insurgency that
turned the tide, but insurgency against statewide, obnoxious, ineffective prohibi
tion, so-called. Will Oregon profit by Maine's error of threescore years ? v
Nothing is settled until it is settled right
Bet
us settle it now and settle, it rigljt.
: THa Hbm&Rule W
limits, It permits an
city, or any precinct or numbeK of precincts or the whole county outside the cities
to vote for ' or against 8 prohibition, as they choose. Under this bill every city ia
.wery county, and every county in the State, may vote "dry" if they so desire.
B
iit
If you want to preserve your rights;
If ydu want local option which means Home Rule; N
If ; jrou" want your glass of beer, cider or liquor at home even tlio you are
opposed to the saloon
: You MUST vote these numfeers (cut them out and put them in your pocket
as a reminder):
328 X Yes. For Home Rule. , ' . ,
343 X No. Against Prohibition Amendment.
345 X No. Against" Prohibition Search Law! '
Think it over I ' .
Prohibition attemptt to override aa
individual and inharaat ribt. That'a
why failure iavarlably followt eaaei
meat of tht law.t It takta the liqeor
traffie from licented dealere who ere
object to refutation and gives it to
lawbreakers who are willing to sell to
minora, drunkard anybddy lot-fain.
f . at Aah tow rronftldoaJet frleai
t eMnr this question: If, as tkey
sdslm S3 millioa people are now living
It "dry" territory, why is it that the
U. 8. Internal Revenue Department
ehows that more whiskey end more
beer is consumed than ever before?
x Respectfully, V, v:''A:;.r::.s-v
GREATER OREGON HOME RULE ASSOCIATION
nw3 CZ