IFC CANDIDATE PROFILES on co»*n>MS s Hole InU-r.vii’vvs .1;: four t\\ u-vc.ir .imi ii!a!r ihc IJ-( iirt’ :n n>.M\ \ i nii Wiling in th>- pt;tn.tf\ xln I Ilk us p I i I < 1 • Wi-.i Thursdav Results w .:. h in ",;m i-«'i in I n.i.iv \ ji.ijwr with ■s for ■n ild : t ion .i mi ' an Steve Masat iui*ui\ for !. r fVl.l l ;?uhior •t ! ';}M-s () I) I M .1 si I Wins i. ross In .1 r. 1 cut* ,iriT. : r.i::•;:!; !ii ,il i \ '! hi'fc will !■<’ v. nu j;: ■ ipv ■lji.itMiM’ : mi ■ nr'v iv?! :■ v:shi! ! v .in.i v i ■■■•< 'mi1 '• i'n J. '.mil m. vi H it I ■ r.i-.cs Vmi i:i !l, ilbU' t. i ■ ; : :■ ■ . I fill ■ . . ! . ! !l ,ll i'll'!! ; : ; ’,'•! ’ M.is.il ► ; ■ • ' ■ , m ! -■!V,.;i}i .it i 111 I Wit llUt I ' i. v ■ i i iii iwr* ■ 1 Mi.!. WHlil 111!' W .IS I hi . W ; ihi.ul ■ ... i • -.mi i- ih i!'s \u.,r nil l iss,to work with .1 group prior to !ht’ hoaringl should moot with thu groups scvcr.il min's iirlori' Ihr hoaring to W . I k it W 1 ; .1: ■ Oust tor till' ()[)| ; i, \, ; N ; i-m it s p |. •.•;■!! to ho!.I t urront group dirt'i tors .,i t oual.itili' tor mis ■ ;:.iV."mi ii! toniicr ilirtK Ntos.it '. is.-, i tior■ ,rr stmm i .is. s whitr a group • :: , : , •:i . ; \ r, i u!1 h/.'d : S iutiditig! .1 ini ;! m gmup sut . vnh d in {tarrying out its goats t i iho lagt Vtiiir or two, it iliiMirvit* (!, I .• prop, itionul.lv (till VV . ! \i t ■ m ta v. ii;IoMg largo budgets lunim d. iisai. for in. .'easing or mum ; lining thf hinigi’tsof smalli'r Mas.It • i 11 .. v . ■ ■! ;■ prl. i *'.. out Ot St ...in v . : to going to do less hi in igi to that pi .gram 'than if :i ■ p«>r< . lit i’■!! i SUM) ,(it,.. ' A gioup ! m‘ tlii it!,!, k ■’■■■!mli.'iit Liiiini ivmilil !u- in iiirmt morn t>v a Id pcrtonl tut ■ • . till- t..M i 1 1(1 lh Zoe Pargot ,i junior m.ounng it mh lologv and minoritig in womans studies : h ■■ is her firs! vm! ■ 11 ! 11 ■ 1 r 11 varsity Siio ts nvmsed in orgaiu/mg the Mutton ,il Organi/atim, : >: Women s t ( 1 ri-ru e to take plat o tins .summer m Eugene ODE: Do you favor across-the-board i uts ,is .i means of keeping foes low, ami if v■ ■ how much Pa rgot: d blanket i ut at rt>ss tie fa :.i t > * ause I the.k \ou have to : i m * k at tail: i a u! \ . ’ ' f 1 e tvlia I. I u 1 ;ii s a re ti i . '.ate'; ;' ■ ' .' s : ii st 11 k . with ear lave' te p 'i ' are ' .’ . -thercd with fu:v\ mut f; a ei they havi to give ami tile rich aren't, and i don't agree w ith tliat ODE Mow no. : vuu insure '....; ten group gels a lair hearing ami a fair budget"' Par-got: Iiv -del. t g w li.it ■ u : group is sa\ ■o e \ a :, , vs ; ,! ties need what •• lie-i .essarv Aisi ss hat e i empaled is wi.t: h groups are getting mere ind if funds tan tie taken from gr i aips that d ;. i mm! as mut It I'll*- main thing is look.eg a! ■•■all :.dividual group and their is sues 01)1. .v. . vi :: s appropriate to bold r urrent group d:n tors ,u countable lor liiismaii agenii-nt by former liret.tors' Pargot i :.as : lie pa: : attention to. ,s * * , , die past all I W hat Is tin* v cl u (i i a i i wrong the lir-'i t i m «• v o u r fund* are ■ ul <)I)K Wool.I you he m favor (|| I lilting targe b u d g i’ 1 s ! o i oinni'iisati* tor increasing nr inuint.uamg thr budgets of smaller groups7 Pal-got: I n some extent I don't think th.it .i r.id k .1 i rut should hr done to unylhing Mot if It's Hu rss.ir\ to take some funds from tfir KMIJ to keep thr [thick Student Union, then wr should I hr main point tii.it has to hr kept in mind is di s ri sit v on i unipus OI)h: Why should studrnts vote lor you' Pargcil: Bn.nisr I am open mindud and I think tli.it r.u ii group should have a s.iy liven il it's somr group tlnit I don't portir ip.itr in it's not something that I'm going to c ut |ust lircuusr I don't agree with this group I'll look .it rat h group individually Steve Suarez Sti ve Sutiriv endi.j,111■ lor ii two year 11(. seat, in <1 law stu dent and a graduate ol Oregon Statr l’niversity OUK: Do you l.ivor across the-board cuts as i moans ol keeping fees low. and if so. how much7 Suarez: No. I don't 1 think there should be uniform criteria for every group, but ! don't think every group is equally de serving of funding, so 1 don't think they should all be cut equally The kind of things I would lixik for are the amount of community service the group does and the effort* it self-reli ant. e that they make ODE: How v> uid you ensure that every group gets a lair hearing and a fair budget? Suarez: I would review every budget honestly skeptically, carefully and fairly. That's what you need I think 1 can give everyone a lair hearing. Certainly. 1 think you should be polite to everyone Everyone should h<- treat**! with rusp ><;l, even wht;n you don't exactly with whiit they re saving OUK Uo you believe it s up propriate to hold current group directors accountable for mis management hy former direc tors' Suarez: 1 think you have to have a certain amount of u< countability I sympathize with people who say, I he last guy in here was a Ikj/o But I think it s really hard, if you’re trying to look at what kind of servlet a group does and how responsi hie they are. to a certain extent they have to he accountable for yvhat somebody else does It s hard to see bow else they can convince you that they’ll be responsible You can take their word on it. but if you can look at a history, that seems more persuasive ODK: Would you be in favor of cutting large budgets to com pensate for increasing or main taining the budgets of smaller groups? Suare/.: I'd be in favor of rut ting -iov budget. I don't < art? how big or how small, if it didn't wm lik • then; was .1 really compelling reason for them to he funded i think the 0resumption should he that .1 group do< s not need funding from the students in order to earrv out tasks OL)K Win should students Turn to SUAREZ, Page 6 S I think thonv is man* po !« * 'll it I in thr largrr bmlgrts for rr>iut:innb. anti m o n • v n i *rgv 1 :• ,i 111 hr tot lisrti.o-n ! h ■ ' H < >1)1- Whs : volt tor you ' Nlas.it » .1 • ! '”■*; -x I’m i:: 11 ! V r t|oM'innstr