EDITORIAL Athletics looks too good for handouts Aw heck, that big ol' debt over in the athletic de partment didn't need to bo paid off all that quirk, did it? Besides, all that tax money the department has been rallying for should be rolling in any minute, taking < are of its debt and any other financial problems So, it's no big deal that the department spent most of the; $(>(H),(HH) it made from the 1090 Freedom Howl game; on attendance expenses for department employ ecs and their friends and families, payroll bonuses, and overtime. The department spent about S t tO.OOO on airfare, travel and meal expenses for 10.) coaches and staff members, along with (Ft of their friends and family members, included in this group were coaches of sports other than football that went along for recruiting purposes. Also spent was nearly 5104.0(H) on bonuses and overtime for department administrators and football coaches. By the time the money was sjmnt, the athletic department netted'about S5.000. Granted, some of the exjM’nditures were absolutely necessary, like overtime and travel expenses for key staff And true-, sue h spending is quite the norm among I’ac 10 football conference sc hools The problem is the* University is not funded like all the other kiefs on the- blea k Because of last year's up proval of Measure .5. which wiped out Oregon's higher education funding, the athletic: department, along with the rest of the University, is suffering signific ant finan cial loss The department recently asked for tax dollars to subsidize1 University athletic s, the state- Hoard of High er Kducation will vote Friday on whether to allocate the funds Someone should give athletic director Bill Byrne and his department officials groveling lessons Don't they know one doesn't wear a coat and tie when asking for handouts? The department now carries the burden of a SI.7 million debt: it, along with the rest of the t adversity, has serious financial problems. However, between the bowl expenditures and Byrne's recent 5)1,(MM) mission to have the Casanova Center sculpture moved, one would never know athletics is in trouble Oregon Emerald 9 O BOD'S* IUGINE OflfGOWtMOJ Ih* (>ug«. vi (>.»•> | i*.i > ** f '»}.«* • j "«■ -* *«4f I «ru!.ty ;i »1 T *' ••.!.*» t) ‘--J *, ■ • „• - »*y.. [ V,» , | • .» «*' f • f Co i’- n! "*• t^v»»■-’. *y of CVo^v- ( - Wi f 5 . »•«# '» ’’ <• ■ ••• •. * • '• •*• *' l Mi«r v \ • . . .■*■%? •< .» "W1!**' >•'"•« V1.,* .«’»»* P */ -. Phi i - ii'.ul -s { ■ . .t o (>m>(.«*-*% I *•■«* .wi ' •«* ..t mi •* - -,«» >’ •*» I d*of m ( h**f Managing t ctrtoi l tlMofial t ditor C»f *4»Nk • | ddoi I rHaftainmant I ditof Atftoi iata I dRo*» i ’ Mn > ‘ i ;»v if'-m (Mr « .kt" l -n ■4. I *»*«' • ■ >♦***% l drtof f ditorul l ddo» 'ifiort% l dilor Night I d»tOf ( HV' I‘Wo”. Jrt*o (i«g M*m Hwg Community H#» *» 1 '** i Sludtnt Government A«tivA*a» i t *» Higher I (Jim •t*or\ Adminnl(il»n t (>*» «• M«fW(t«(l I iif -y P.i'wy • t S «».* «• ‘ f • J" »».S >•«»-• * ■ *• ► w»vv \i ► *> l a\ l M «k;t w >' ' , Copy I drtor* ' «»* ( »i t • •• ► »,«i { s > ■«»i ('.» Hi , l ftw.1 M '-'■** i M" » •* » ► « ’ * '•<*»»»* Photogf e*>her» -v.r i > A »j w *Ci •» Advertising .kM- f; «»y !mi>" D v t l ir. I i li i r 1 • ■. i M'*ry »i M«>y 4« U("i . t *• '• m" V - * i • '.» • . v.' Classified t’lVijy *»>»' Ki». A - .. ■ . A » '*■*. V<» ,i IkillftMl ► » ’ » 1 l tx» •» Sv4P^V BhV >*ly t O ' , Production W «» > «* A ..»■ f . i • I * itryil '<« A • >«.: HI (\r t \j**r >Uk.»5 **' M .**> ; '***i ».4 \ ‘ oi'h . i > M Air U Jit ‘»k H.v.rtl *•» <• A «. w. W V t .* U»*d W Cienersi Manager J *N IU»: M4S&11 146 45t 7 Muvtnnn^ ' i .1 n N»*r*fOO*n OftiC* [).»4*4#y Advertising Advertising 346 371? 346 4 34 3 A_WOS % ' W TI. < S . V H- lii. •. * 1 I see the legislature is debating school 8id p3YmenC^a^am. Watson’s attitude questionable THE FINE PRINT BY CHRIS BOUNEFF In ti>i' large m i >| m • of i omiiic events n really wasn't that big of .1 di'.il \SI () Vif e President Jo So n 1.1 Wats-m iiaii sf; |i 111 i' I about seven (lolbirs worth of stuff from tin' University book '.lore rti.il vs.is m November Ut'IO t ampus putil it at ions didn't find out .ifiout it until Novemlier 1‘l'tl In tile Inter tin. W atsi in basil! performed any earth shattering m Is, especially i onsldenng stu dent government doesn't do null ll III the first pbu e So. it really isn't that big of a deal h\< ept for her attitude I n Wits; ; i s ( [edit, she til milted that stealing the liter i hatliilse yy.e. a mistake l‘o her dlsiredil Watson does not be lieve the inrtdeiil does or si-,. hi Id rellei t on her leadership abilities Ibis lit | 11 nil ! some yv ll at surprising, especial!} from someone who voted to remove former Ini idonlal l ee Commit tee Cb.iiniian Mu Intel Colson bom the lit' after a kangaroo investigation by last year s A SCO president concluded that Colson might have altered the official minutes lor an li t meeting Based on such incon clusive findings, Watson yv.is perfectly willing to remove someone from student govern ment who yy.isn't ever found guilty ol anything U as the alteration to the mm tites a tug deal' Yes and no I he actual c hange yv.is mint niiil Hu! someone violated the trust betvm i n public anti public servant, and that is serious \fter tiie shabbily conducted investigation, (.oI son was Mamed Ills judgment was questioned eventually he was retnov eti Watson's theft was just as minimal, l'ostlt notes, batteries and a troll doll do not consti tute a conspirai v to undermine student voters, but the theft does tell us something about Watson It tells voters something of her dei tston-riniking and rea soiling abilities She took items very non essential items, for no reason She tailed to comply with the ruling against her She didn't appear lor some court dates, and she was delinquent m paving her fines What this means in the larger scope of student government isn’t clear, hut it should have been up to voters to decide, so Watson shouldn't he surprised that people are questioning her abilities as a student leader And it s not just the College Kepublu ans doing the ques tioning The group sees a i ham e to jump all over some one whose politic s are the op postte of the organization's, si milar to how Watson and com party attacked Colson his arise of his views Hut even main stream students, like myself, are now more skeptical of Wat son Watson, however, chose for students what it should mean nothing "I’eople might question me," she saiii, "hut you can also look at ll as if. well, you didn't know about it before then and you didn't question me. so win .ir• ■ V(iu bother mg rue n« n\ The problem is th.it these non earth shattering events sometimes do make .1 dilfer ence. anti it should be up to tin* voters to consider what does and what does not tip the stales one wav or the other Watson should know that Fortunately for Watson, tin results ol her actions may never he known With only t> percent ol the student body voting Iti last spring s election, the likell hood that a full 10 percent ol the student body caring enough to sign .1 recall petition is low And even if it is put on the ballot, getting another i. percent to vote i n a rei a II elect ion shows the issue is moot and shows student government lor the joke it is With all this i n mind, though. I would like to think that we could hold oor leaders (and I'm not talking about piddly student senators, hut the people who represent students outside the University) to a higher standard, that we he al lowed to consider something other than a golden trac k re ( oril, if It exists That we be allowed to ques turn Clarence Thomas alxiul al legations of sexual harassment or berate Ted Kennedy lor his womanizing, and that however trivial, we question Watson's judgment for stealing and her unremorseful attitude about possibly violating the public trust. The answer is uncertain, hut the question is right And Wat son should know that Chris Uouncff is news