EVALUATIONS Continued from Page 1 an Instructor at Academic Learning Services “Tliere are lots of professors who have no evaluations on file," Powell said. "Students who need good teachers have no wav to find them at a great many classes at the University, espet tally lirst year language* and required math classes At thu end of each term, students all over campus rate the teach ers and the courses that have occupied their time for the past do/ e.i or so weeks. For many, it’s an opportunity to praise the inspiring leader ul a great class. For others, it's a chance to clobber the pedant who tor merited them with a course that shouldn't have been inflict I o;i unrepentant felons, let alone bright college students. When all of the evaluations for a class are gathered at the d p nt tnent office, thov are summarized tiv ha; .1 or are sent to tin: on pus Computing Center to be summarized I>v mat,trine The originals are given to the 'nstfucturs after ail grade-, h i\ e ixsen submit! i tnd i : ;r\> - • < to.ii:i-.e.- 'tile it ttia.de determine vv her her a particular instrur'or ! iv i f ., > • oat s true, but d ■ not the w non: s.* : "Student evaluations are ;ust onr ueoe o: ,ie in -irurtor . m lion." said Lorraine Davis, .me provost lor .a aitomu p- rsonrie: They're not the only evaluation of teaching bv any mi an*." Decisions regarding faculty retention, promotion and teuun also are based on interviews with department heads, assessments by other faculty members who sit in on classes, participation in re search and other criteria, Davis said If a student includes signed comments with the evaluation, those, too, go into the instructor's file. Unsigned forms