COMMENTARY Bill of Rights faces serious tests bearcn, seizure interpretations differ broadly By Hasan Jafri Emerald Contributor 1991 murks the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights, the 10 amendments to the U S -Const i tution tii.it protect individuals against government intrusion In 1791 the Bill of Rights guaranteed the people free speech, free press, free exercise of religion, restrictions on the power of police to search homes and due process ol law, to name a few. Two hundred years later, ac cording to some observers the Bill of Rights is losing its pow ers. Indeed, the Bill ot Rights has seen some serious tests recent ly The Supreme Court ruled that flag burning is a legitimate form of political expression protected by the First Amend ment. However, the highest court of the land decided that using pe yote in Native American reli gious ceremonies is not protect ed the First Amendment The court also held that random drug testing of public employ ees did not violate the search and seizure protection of the Fourth Amendment. Some observers view these actions us a broad interpreta tion of the Bill of Rights, while others view them as curtail ments of individual freedoms. "1 would say there is serious erosion of rights," said Stevie Xsf < 'V C'T:. Gtiptac by M»rtt* A/wWr»o« Remington, executive director of the Oregon i hapter of the A m i: r i c a 0 Civil 1.1 i) e r! i e s Union "The\ .ire culling 1>0 vents old." Tom Coffin, a Kugeno federal prosecutor who touches law ut the University, sees it different ly. "The Dill of Rights is alive," Coffin said "If something is alive, it breathes, it exhales and inhales There is expansion and contraction There is a certain mindset that the Bill of Rights is to expand civil liberties, and anything elso is contrary to it David Schuman, a constitu tional law professor at the Uni versity. said Americans are not particularly fond of the Bill of Rights "I think Americans have u strange relationship with the Hill of Rights.” tir s.iiii "On one hand, th<*\ worship tin' crowning at hievement of tint American democratii expel, merit "On tin' other hand. 1 think that if tin' people could vote thumbs up or down on a propo sitfon to repeal the Hill ot Rights, they will vote in favor of repealing it Ilie most serious erosion. Schuntan said, is in the Fourth Amendment, whit h prolm ts in dividuals from unnei essarv search and seizure The Fourth Amendment has come to he identified with i rlminals who .ire caught with evid m e. espe ciallv in the war against drugs, he said 111 a lilHU Oallup pull. ’U per lent of those surveyed respond Turn toRIGHTS. Pago 6 ! Mother Kali’s Books j f c'debrntinc7 Utmuv? In All Our Diversities J 1 w< >rm-*n c*! * < >1* >t it '.*, -*.h vv * U-vbirt”.' ( I i (VWs ucA ontf' 2001 I i.mklm Hkd *r> [ ihjt'in' OH l) M(' 1 aonu'.'i . imivt J'«•!:< nit a is Om‘>52 M) I .. 13th \i ili High vmm-i. t MIDDLE EASTERN & ► MEDITERRANEAN CUISINE 19th & Agate 683-6661 -TS •~i ar t save money on Macintosh I 's the ileal \AeVe some (if the most Apple* M.k Uit( tsli1 With M KIR' I >t ith *t |» ipul.ii Apple printers Bus < me«>t these combmatk m> .ind sue I>ig bu< ks C k It It' ( k » »I Nt >SS get gi mu; Hus' tier i is.ul aisle only !< >r .1 limited time See sour .lutlx m/ed Apple uimpus reseller t< *U\ !i >i deuiLs .And dtv i iver the |> >\set > I M.u ir tosh The |Xiwer to tie your best" I I Macintosh Classic VJ:r uhrti >*u .i»i .t; '< ‘tiLtHe M-m ini‘ i/j « iiuu • v i-mpukrr a t.'A cUhirr j n Vxrtl'nfa'' ' u* 4;f « /'i-n.»/uj/ /iiwr'4 * pnntsr * Macintosh LC \*l* i mv' ' .jm ■j fcr*J h ;*r‘ r *;*«. '- . iv* * -v*