Oregon Daily Emerald Subliminal messages. Are they for real? See Page 7 Tuesday, November 11. 1986 Eugene, Oregon Volume 88, Number 49 Photo b> Mie established so the change will not be seen immediately, but in the next decade the change will he seen, she said The technology of the Nor thwest softwood industry has developed from primarily worker-run sawmills to laser automated mills that require Continued on Page 5 Disparity in state faculty salary rankings discussed By Chris Nor red 04 th« t.m«r«ld Officials of the Stale Hoard of Higher Education and the Oregon Educational Coordinating Commis sion are saying the differences in their rankings of faculty salaries should not present a problem when the legislature is asked to approve faculty pay raises. "One has to take a look at the overall agenda that the OECC has. versus the agenda that the State Hoard has." said Dave Quenzer. associate vice chancellor of budget and fiscal policy for the State Board. "Even though there is a difference (in the rankings). I think the conclu sions of the OECC and the State Board State Board and OECC disagree on timing an; basically the same." th.it salaries are low. Quenzer said. Friday the OECC approved its assessment of the State Hoard's budget request to Ini presented to the governor. The State Hoard is re questing $47.7 million from the state's General Fund to Ire dedicated to faculty pay increases at Oregon's public four-year colleges and universities. The State Hoard says the pay in creases would achieve its goal of plac ing Oregon faculty salaries in the top one-third of comparable institutions nationwide by 1992-93. Hut the OW:C. using different criteria for figuring faculty salaries, says tin* $->7.7 million salary adjust men! will put Oregon in the top one third hy the 1UB7-HH fiscal year There are obvious reasons for the differences, said T k Olson, ex ecutive director of the OKCX1 One major reason is that the OfcCC includes in Oregon salaries the state's ti percent employee retirement con tribution (pars.), Olson said. "When you include that as salary, that raises Oregon's salaries by ti percent.” Another reason for the differences is that the State Board has used in stitutional comparisons only, whilt? the OKCC uses Imth inslilutional and state-by stale comparisons. Olson salfl. "When you r,ink things by stain, it yinlds somewhat different results. It provides a different and useful com parator. For some purposes, the in stitutional comparisons are ap propriate. for other purposes the state-by-state are useful." The State Hoard "considers that the way we should look at it is institution by institution because we compete for faculty with other institutions, not with other states." Quenzer said. "We do not include that (pers.) in our salary averages because there are such Continued on Page 12