Charge your way to a better credit rating See Page 4A t. • f~ ir i— >~ir n it ~ - ~~ T I ti I Tl - --*»• •»**« I ■»**- i -f' ,-l-ti-’l if i/m- - ..A.. - - -^y . .-^--m «... Oregon Daily Emerald Wednesday. February 19. 1986 Eugene, Oregon Volume 87, Number 101 ‘Crazy’ men aren’t always major rape perpetrators, panel agrees By Amy Moss , • • OfthifamW’^ ■ • .. ' It Is hotthe"crazy'.' group of. men who rape. . Rather.tha'men who poople of our.culture consider .- •'nof’mai ■ -thai'meri we are friends with, have gone. / out with.or are* married to — are inost often'the. . rapists.- ah official on rape said Tuesday night . * '•* ' .. .. . Ifelena See and Karen Kane, both of the Rape. -, Crisis •Nettybfk, spoke at*>ut defining aqtiaintance . rape to a'group of more than 50 people, in the FMU. Forum - Room, Tuesday's-event was the first in a ... si hedu|e. t») b*^ non-aggressive, sub • ' .'nu.3.siy'e,' an'd Weak.'if ..we ask. ourselves which side . makes a'Better Victim, tbe'answer is obvious." Kane . -‘ ^ ;.said:;v'';‘'.*'. She;blames, many qT the prevalent attitudes in sotiiety on how riieh and .women are port rayed in TV. pornography and impular. music, and how those -• ihed.ia-perpetuate the sex roles that we. are trained in . to.acting.out. ..- • Kane quoted a line from a popular Rick Spr ingfield song ‘^Affair of the Heart." in which Spr ingfield says:.:"I want to control you, I want to seize you. I waht to rape you, I want to kill you." A Bruce Sprifigsteen soiig; she said, illustrates an even mom cominonvittitude: "You say no: you say you don't like itrbuf f kiKtyy,you're a liar." > ' : " "This.'is.'t'Ke kind of music we all hear, hum along with.and .realty learn a lot from very subtly." • . Kane said;..'. °' • ■ • . . Men are taught that when women say "no." . -^what they really mean is "ves." "That is one of the thousand scenarios that leads up to date rape," Kane said. ■ , Kane also spoke about marital or relationship rape. We live in a society where it is not illegal in r — .. many states to rape your, wife of girlfriend, she said. . I'1 25 states, including Oregon1.- marital.rape is con sidered illegal. Hut" in 2;3‘*staies a..fnan can rape his wife if they are living together: r^pe is'only con-. sicJered a crime if they are not livirig'togethei; when it-’ • happens. In Alabama’and Vermont; rnarifal rape is . \ never considered illegal'.she-said.. ' *. . Kane defined marital-rape’dhe- saitje as aquain- '' .tance rape. She said'there"are‘rfiaiiy, reason^ why ’ women consent to both, forms pf,r»p‘e.’. Among them, is.ignorance, the fact fhaf’womeh are socialized to think it is okay for men'tp;do-these thihgs‘tp: them that it is their duty asa woman to consent! she saici. Raymond Scully,* |ack-Straton and Kmie.'Ran . dolfi from Men Against. RapV also, spoke.'to .-the audience, .- .• >•' V-*•*•.-.•.■• \ . ''Women have a fundamental right to terminate ;• sex at any point.of their.'choosjng,';!«Sfra'fpn °said. ■ ‘Men must accept the-responsibilfy of changing the • altitudes ihai perpeiiirtte>rape.'7*he’added/-. - "• >• •,* • * • .-'ft- *, " *. -m c'oa \k -. «• • » > ,.i f . -Straton believes !hat thefearO. men-vyho'wiflnot. ■“ control themselves, but nb mcui;«vho canhorconirol. • themselves. . •*'. “ ' “The attitude that women-owe men sex is false,.* ' ‘Men are socialized to be ag gressive, dominant and tough, and women to be non-aggressive, submissive and weak. If we ask ourselves which side makes a bet ter victim, the answer is obvious.% — Karen Kane . and the idea that rape is somehow natural is also, false. I am a man. and I will not rape." Straton said. The Men Against Rape members; of which there are Hi. believe it is their job to educate men about the issue of rape. They think wOmeh can also educate .' men by tolling their boyfriends. or male family ‘ members how they feel about rape, arid encourage' men to talk about their feelings' • ; ' Rape is a man's issue, and to Understand more .. about rape we have to understand'more about howv we were socialized." Randolfi said, "I’m grateful for . the opportunity I had to grow tip and learrrthat (the misconceptions of society) are not the. .way things really are. • . /, . • -. "We need to give m/sn; the opportunity to challenge the roles that they grew up-with and pre sent new ways for them to be masculine," he said. •" • Students now taking University to court over heating dispute •. By Linda Hahn • Of thr Kmniiid '« * * Michelle Totalinsoft-and .other similarly situated ; ' . University lijn residents now. are taking'tfie'l Iniversity'-. ‘ 'to.court for failing to maintain'adequate h.eat at .the " University Inn last term, * '• f. , • Apparent ly- the .defendants in the ’ matter .were ‘ unaware of- a. .to-day deadline .to respond to'the’ claim. . andlhus Waived their right tp rbspondto it lastThbrs « d^y.'one month, after original letter dated jan* 13, ■ ptHti w«|s sent., . • .- •' ... f The complain! fiied-against the complex is in the. • form’.of- 4 tort claim, dr. a wrongdoing.resulting In civil . , ‘ actipn..-The .plaintiffs, .who cither than Tomlinson re-. /.main- tinna'med 'as yet. charge that. Hie temperature oh .their floor yvds uncomfortably low during faH term and* •.;.that1.they*ShopId.he-reimbursed for part of the.ireon-' '. • , fractcid^rent.; *•> . "Because a letter advising.State Assistant Attorney • -. C.enerai james Cyasby'of fh'e.ciann received no response. • ihtj'stuyfents’ ajtomey,.Robert Afckerman. of Ackerman. . "DeWenter.fk l.luntsbe'rger; will.file a class action suit on .behalfdf his clients w.ithin seven days. ' * ••-' .' '_TH.be-preparing..the papers-tliis'week. We gave °■ them their opportunity. We gave them 30 days to makp . .an,adjustment." 'Ackerman Jaid.- "P$ow\ we_go* to ' •. . court." •'*' ’ ... ; ...... "Uasby'.did. not know much about the case because . .. • he.had- refe.rred it to Peter Swan.. University -law .pro, fessor arid assistant to the president for legal affairs, he 'said..Swap said-on Tuesday he knew very little afaiout the case because he.haci given.it to research-assistant. . ■ He expected'more information bv next week.. , When inform'pd of the students', plan to’sue.. Swan .said'he was'not aware of the 10-day.limit. He said he just%.received-‘the papers,on the case last week. Jlis secretary had not-yet opened a file on the case and-his research' assistant currently had the papers, .'Swan . added.' V • . • ■ ' . • ‘‘It.seems like I had seen, somewhere that, they •' threatened a class action.suit, bui'1 didn't know about • the'30-day limit," Swan said. • • • - Swan also said that the students "leapfrogged Upiversity.chahnels" by filing a tort claim. People who have a grievance can try to get relief informally., even witfi an attorney, he said. If they da not think they are going to get satisfaction, they then siiould’try other op tions, he said. Bill Kittredge. director of the Office of.Student Ad vocacy, said the students tried unsuccessfully last term to get a response to the problem through other channels. ' / ;• -... . ° ' "They spent seven -weeks going through Universi ty channels, which is mired in incompetence.".-Kit-* tredge said, “They (University officials), acted', very, indifferently." • • t- • • • Continued on Page 6A Board to determine proposed research park site By Paul SturU Of Mm bwrtW Whether the Riverfront Research Park will Mnd up located at the selected Willamette River site may now be deter mined by the land Use Hoard of Ap peals' interpretation of an 11-year-old ruling AI Urquhart. a University geography professor, challenged the City of Eugene Tuesday by arguing that the far reaching Willamette Greenway legisla tion of 1975 nullifies any plans for such a park The city failed to prove that Industrial development would enhance the natural, scenic and environmental quality of the Greenway as is specified in this area's general plan before Land Use Board of Appeals referees In Salem, t'rquharl said. "Any ambiguity disappears when one reads the purposes of the Creenway statutes." he said. "The rules spell out quite precisely what can be allowed along the river. " After Dec:. 6. 1975. the Creenway legislation does not permit intensified land use of areas within 150 feet of the river unless the lands considered are deemed not suitable for natural, scenic or recreational uses. The city has targeted the Riverfront Research Park as critical In the diver sification of the area's economy, The proposed site, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, was selected because of its proximity to the Universi ty and the research activities already conducted on campus. Tim Sercombe. a city attorney, defended the city's plans as being within the Greenwav’s guidelines and said the area was not considered a "needed open space or a significant resource area." Urquhart charged the city did not suf ficiently study the area or adequately note its quality before proceeding with plans to develop it industrially. Plans for converting areas designated "open space" inlo ones for research park use did not take into account the concerns and needs of the community. including its recreational uses, Ur* quhart said In addition, he said the plans are not consistent with the University'# North Campus Plan, which designates the areas for open space and recreational uses. In the city's written argument. Ser combe says that since the land is owned by the State Board of Higher Kducation. not the University, consistency with the University's North Campus Plan is not required. The Land Use Board of Appeals will announce ils formal decision March 17. If the board upholds Urquhart's appeal, the city’s plans could be stalled indefinitely