Oregon S' Emerald ANNE CRAVEN Editor ROSEANN LECKIE Business Manager ELIZABETH HAUGEN Managing Editor FRANNIE MAIER Advertising Manager EDITORIAL BOARD Norris Yates, Edith Newton, Carol Sibulski Published daily during the college year except Sundays, Mondays, and holidays and final examination periods by the Associated Students. University of Oregon. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice, Eugene, Oregon. fyoA a Rettesi 'Wan.ld . . . Thinking in America is running on a new track. People arc turning more and more to internationalistic philosophies in place of the old nationalism. A new day in the whole atti tude of the American people is dawning. Don't you believe it! Optimistically we are trying to tell ourselves that overnight people can change their whole mode of thought. We tend to congratulate ourselves by saying that this time we won't revert to isolationism; the people are so desirous of peace and an international organization to insure a peaceful world that they will wholeheartedly support some form of an international governing body. But a closer scrutiny reveals that most of us still have our old nationalistic thoughts with only a thin veneer of inter nationalism spread over the top. Often, it is true, when pinned down we find our attitudes to be one of internationalism. But we include the qualification that there are certain matters the U. S. must attend to in order to safeguard our future existence. For instance, while there must be a strong international organ ization, with an international army, the United States should also have a strong army and navy to guard against further aggression by the “robber” nations. Or we agree that all inter national disputes should he taken before the United Nations or the International Court of Justice, but we maintain that those directly affecting our "national honor” or position in the western hemisphere should be handled by this country, without the outside aid of a world organization. This type of thinking can only lead us backwards. While priding ourselves in thinking along the new popular lines, we really have retained too much of the outmoded ideas which were responsible for the present world war. Let’s examine our thoughts a little more closely. Let's find out if we really believe in a strong international organization which would have the power to secure peace or whether we are just giving lip service to an idea. We should realize that a revolution in thought will have to take place before an effective organization will work. We cannot retain the old ideas while striving to assimilate the new. JWe cannot demand a peaceful world if we are not ready to give up a few inches of our sovereignty in exchange for security. The question is: Are we really ready to do our part in insur ing this better world we are all looking forward to?—M.A.C. SametUin