Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Oregon daily emerald. (Eugene, Or.) 1920-2012 | View Entire Issue (May 18, 1933)
C me ml it University of Oregon, Eugene Richard Neuberger, Editor Harry Schenk, Manager Sterling Green, Managing Editor EDITORIAL BOARD Thornton Gale, Associate Editor; Jack Bellinger, Julian Prescott. UPPER NEWS STAFF Oscar Munper, JNowa Kjd. Francis Pal lister, Copy Ed. Bruce Itnniby. Sports Ed. Parks Hitchcock, Makeup Ed. Bob Moore, Chief Nipht Ed. donn tiroas, i.iterury r,o Hob Guild, Dramatics Ed. Jessie Steele, Women’s Ed. Esther Hayden. Society Ed. Ray Clapp, Radio Ed. BUSINESS STAFF Amv. Mur., Ainnr ary i* rs National Adv. Mur.. A uU>n Bush Promotional Mgr., Marylou Patrick Asst. Adv, Mgr., Or a n t Theummo). Asst.. Adv. Mgr. Bill Russell ClAl.t lHIVI' 1/VI VUI/ I Anno Clack Circulation Mgr., Ron Row. | Office Mgr., Helen Stinger ClaBH. Ad. Mgr., Althea Peterson Cheyking Mgr., Ruth Storla Chocking Mgr.. Pearl Murnhy ____ DAY EDITORS: Rob Patterson, Francis Pallistcr, Doug Polivka, ] Joe Saslavsky, Ralph Mason. NIGHT EDITORS- Rob McCombs, Douglas MacLean, John ■ • H Jlopetcr. Dob Couch, Don Evans, Fred Brown. SPOUTS STAFF: Malcolm Bauer, Asst. Editor; Ned Simpson, Bob Riddle, Rob Avison. Bill Ebcrhart, Jack Chinnock, and Roberta Moody, Jack Miller. FEATURE WRITERS: Elinor Henry, Maximo Pulido, Hazlo , Corrigan. REPORTERS: Julian Prescott. Madeleine Gilbert, Ray Clapp. Ed Stanley, David Eyre, Bob Guild, Paul Ewing, Cynthia Liljeqvist, Ann-Rced Burns, Peggy Chessman. Ruth King, Betty Ohlemiller. Roberta Moody, Audrey Clark, Bill Belton, Don Olds, Gertrude Land), Roland Parks, Frances Hardy, Hcnriotte Horak. WOMEN'S PAGE ASSISTANTS: Jane Opsund, Elsie Peterson, ! Mary Stewart, and Elizabeth Crommelin. COPYREADERS: Harold Brower, Nar.cy Lee, Margaret Hill. Edna Murphy, Mary Jane Jenkins, Frances Roth well, Caro line Rogers, Claire Bryson. ASSISTANT NIGHT EDITORS Betty Gearhart. Portia Booth, Jean Lackel, Margaret Corum, Carolyn Schink, Betty Shoe maker, Ruth Vannice, June Sexsmith, Carmen Blais, Elma ' Giles, Evelyn Schmidt, Cynthia Liljcqvist, Frances Neth, Frances Hardy, Gwen La Barre. RADIO STAFF: Ray CJlapp, Editor; Barney Clark, George Callas, Marjorie Me Niece. SECRETARIES—Louise Beers, Lina Wilcox. ADVERTISING ASSISTANTS: Fred Fisher, Ed Labbc, Cor-j rinno Plath, Bill Meissner. Ruth Baker, George Brice, Parker Favier, Eldon Haberman, Maurice Vannier, Frances Fearnley, Bill Schloth, Bill Perry, Tom Holman. OFFICE ASSISTANTS: Phyllis Cousins, Patricia Campbell. Betty Bretscher, Betty Hently, Elma Giles, Jeanette Thomp son, Jean Bailey, Marjorie McNiece, Willa Bit/., Betty Shoe Maker, Ruth Byerly, Ruth McCornack, Mary Jane Jenkins, Virginia Blais. EDITORIAL OFFICES. Journalism Bldg. Phone 3300—News | Room, Local 355; Editor and Managing Editor, Local 354. J BUSINESS OFFICE, McArthur Court. Phone 3300—Local 214. j --.---j A member of the Major College Publications, represented by j A. J. Norris Hill Co., 155 E. 42nd St., New York City; 123 W. Madison St., Chicago; 1004 End Ave., Seattle; 1206 Maple Ave., Los Angeles ; Call Building, San Francisco. The Oregon Daily Emerald, official student publication of the University of Oregon, Eugene, issued daily except Sunday and Monday during the college year. Entered in the postoffice at Eugene, Oregon, as second-class matter. Subscription rates, 92.50 a year. - The Emerald's Creed for Oregon There Is always the human temptation to forget that the erection of buildings, the formulation of new curricula, the expansion of departments, the crea tion of new functions, and Bimilar routine duties of the administration are but means to an end. There is always a glowing senBe of satisfaction in the natural impulse for expansion. This frequently leads to regard ing achievements as ends in themselves, whereas the truth is that these various appearances of growth and achievement can be justified only in so far as they make substantial contribution to the ultimate objec tives of education .... providing adequate spiritual and intellectual training for youth of today—the citi zenship of tomorrow. ... “ . . . . The University should be a place where classroom experiences and faculty-contacts should stimu late and train youth for the most effective use of all the resources with which nature has endowed them. Dif ficult and challenging problems, typical of the lifo and world in which they are to live, must be given them to solve. They must be taught under the expert supervision of instructors to approach the solution of these problems in a workmanlike way, with a dis ciplined intellect, with a reasonable command of the techniques that i re involved, with a high sense of in tellectual adventure, and with a genuine devotion to the ideals of intellectual integrity. . . ,M—From the Biennial Report of the University of Oregon for 1931-32. The American people cannot be too careful in guarding the freedom of speech and of the press against curtailment as to the discussion of public affairs and the character and conduct of public men. —Carl ischurs. A TRIBUTE AT THE END OF THE TRAIL ABOVE these columns this year we have pub lished daily our creed for Oregon. Two reasons prompted our selection of the particular passage used, and as we near the termination of our edi torial labors, we set them forth. One was the splendid logic and high ideals contained therein. The other was that it might stand as a sincere and heartfelt tribute to the man whose ingenuity and intellect conceived it a year ago. Arnold Bennett Hall wrote our creed for the ' University, ft is an excerpt from the 1932-33 bi ennial report which he submitted to the state board of higher education. We were not fortunate enough to include Dr. Hall among our contribuors this year, for he left the campus for the east before the Emerald started publication. But we have felt his inspiring presence and personality in the little agate-type creed which graced the masthead each morning. Turn for a moment to the creed above these columns. Head it slowly and carefully; give par ticular attention to the lofty principles it ex presses, to the vision and foresight it portrays. We have prided ourselves on being somewhat en lightened, but we know we are far from being as clear ami articulate in our views and opinions as Dr. Arnold Bennett Hall. Daily surveillance of bis masterful statements has proven that beyond doubt. And we are not ashamed to admit it. Dr. Hall has been virtually forgotten here, but his work and labors always will be remembered. Few students knew the little man whose light in Johnson hall often burned into the small hours of the morning as he outlined plans for the Univer sity. But those who knew him never will cease to cherish thiir brief association with so high principled an individual. The same is true of the faculty members fortunate enough to share Dr. Hall's friendship. Arnold Bennett Hall was not widelv-liked by politicians, nor was he of the shrewdest in his dip lomatic associations. But neither has been most of the nation's great men, and Dr. Hall cun take far more satisfaction in looking hack over the trail he blazed with the weapons of courage and fore sight than he could if he had walked a broad high way with polities and evasive tactics as his aides. The pen is almost to slip from our hands, but we could not relinquish it without paying tribute to a fine and honorable gentleman who dedicated the best years of his life to the University of Ore gon ; REWARDS OF SCHOLARSHIP 'T'O him who makes both Phi Beta Kappa and Sigma Xi, the Emerald extends special con-; gratulations. It is a sufficient honor to be recog-, nized by either of these scholastic fraternities, but t to be awarded membership in both is a distinction j that merits the highest praise. , George Sterling Bailey received the high honor of active membership in Sigma Xi and Phi Beta Kappa. Donald H. Saunders received associate j membership in Sigma Xi and active membership in Phi Beta Kappa, as did also Lewis Fendrich, who was a member of the "Senior Six.” Mr. Bailey I and Mr. Saunders were recipients of the Jakway j Memorial scholarship in chemistry at the conclu- j sion of their junior year. Of the entire senior i class, these three are th~ only ones to receive this double honor, election to the highest scholastic fra- ; ternities in both the arts nd the sciences. One who is elected to both of these honorary societies must have achieved a broad and liberal education, receiving the highest grades, and at the same time must have shown special aptitude for scientific research. The common tendency is to do good work by specializing; he who achieves dis tinction in both the humanities and in the more technical field of science shows the type of ability from which great men are made. OPPORTUNITY FOR HONOR ARIES \ NY campus organization carries with its name the prestige of the A. S. U. O. and of the University of Oregon. Business men down town do not draw the distinction between living organi zations and groups that have a purely honorary and professional function. Consequently, when hon orary organizations do not meet their current in debtedness, the credit of the A. S. U. O, and all organizations suffers as a result. At many prominent Eastern colleges the finances of such groups are controlled by the graduate man ager's office. In fact, some of them go so far as to make publications at the end of the year of disbursements and receipts. The system at these schools has been successful in keeping honoraries out of debt. Yesterday the Executive Council went on rec ord as favoring this system for the University of Oregon. The graduate manager has offered the co* operation of his office with any honorary that is interested.in putting its funds under their control. The accounts could be handled by the present per sonnel of his office at 'only a small fee for the actual work of bookkeeping and accounting. Hon oraries that accept this liberal offer would insure to themselves the advantages of not only keeping out of debt, but of receiving competent advice in the purchase of materials and the budgeting of their finances. This financial control would apply not only to the mere handling of moneys, but under the ideal system would forbid purchases of any nature un less requisitions were first drawn, and proper pro vision made for their redemption. Some students can remember how class finances were straightened out by putting them under the direction of the graduate manager’s office. We feel that the necessity for unified control of these numerous organizations is becoming more apparent every day. Every year sees additional chapters installed on the campus. We feel that many organizations will be glad to take advantage of the opportunity offered by the graduate manager. BEHIND CLASSROOM DOORS \ DAY before yesterday we trotted out the uni versity skeletons. After condemning Colum bia university for dismissal of Donald Henderson for participation in liberal movements, wc glanced In retrospect at our own record and listed a few of the brave professorial souls who were crucified on the cross of convention and offered up as sacri fices on the altar of mammon. These men had the courage of their convictions: we salute them. But only yesterday one inquisitive senior cyni cally observed that we had painted a rosy picture of academic freedom at the University of Oregon. How straight is the dope they feed you? lie in quired. How much freedom has the average pro fessor? lie challenged. We take up the gauntlet, anti reply, the Oregon faculty lias displayed forti tude and integrity in endeavoring to present thei>’ honest personal beliefs. In the face of social an tipathy they have tried to paint a fair and accu rate picture of existing conditions. But their path j has been a difficult one. Time and again we have gasped as our econ i profs spilled "liie real dope." In the sanctum of the classroom we were amazed to learn that all | was not holy on the eastern front. And those of I us who gathered rounu the rostrum, as the class j beat a hasty exit after the gong sounded, were 1 eager to get the "straight low-down”—the stuff | too raw to spill before the multitude. Always we I were cautioned that this “inside stuff” was for i personal consumption. Publication in the Emerald was taboo; the less said the better. Behind closed doors we've been getting an inkling of the real | truth. We honestly think that there is a greater meas ure of liberty accorded the professors at Oregon than most universities. Although they have wor shipped at the hush-hush shrine, stepping softly and bowing down to the god of things as they are, they have not neglected to slip over a telling punch 1 now and then, leaving an enduring impression on the more thoughtful scholars. President Franklin D. Roosevelt lias decided that the old order is not perfect. He Inis chosen university professors to help change it. The least we can do is endeavor to accord the same privilege to our own faculty. We must pay them for their speech, not their silence. What must be done to guarantee real academic freedom? Here is our reply. First of all. we must have a strong president, a liberal, an educator, a fighter. Real leadership I is the first essential.' Security of tenure must be provided. Long-term-contracts for professors no precipitate dismissals. These are imperative. The university faculty must be the judge ol the heresies of its members. They and they alone should de termine whether a professorial act warrants dis i charge. And last, but hardly least, if vve cannot oftei decent compensation to our instructors, we should seek out young, courageous scholars who are willing to fight lor their ideals and to tell the 1 truths as they see them. Without academic free dom the university is a mockeiy; without intellec tual nii-.^nd' education t- a tragedy_ "" B Selling Gold Short R (Editor's note: This article from the Morning Oregonian is by Prof. Jesse H. Bond of the University of Oregon school of business administration. It has received widespread comment from bankers and monetary ex perts.) BY JESSE H. BOND TO7HY DID our recent form of the ” gold standard give trouble;; Because it required us to seii that particular commodity short on a vast scale. For convenience, the process is here described as though we stid had the dollar of fixed weight and fineness, since most people regard this as the sound arrangement to which we shall return as soon as the emergency is over. This dollar is a vast improvement upon money units that varied and depreciated at the whims of autocrats or of legislatures’ but it does not fit the credit system or the machine technology. It is bound to throw the economic mechanism out of ad justment the moment goods in gen eral become plentiful enough to force down our price level as measured by fixed-weight dollars. This is true because the fear of price declines paralyzes the credit system. Writing, now, from the “normal” standpoint, when Uncle Sam hands us paper money or sells us bonds, he specifically agrees to deliver at a future date a fixed weight of gold, regardless of changes in it^ value meantime. This is selling gold short. Every other borrower neces sarily does likewise. These short sales build up an enormous “short interest,” making quick rises in the value of the commodity inevit able whenever anything so fright ens the “shorts” that they “rush ' to cover.” * * * This is not a newly discovered fact ; it is merely an attempt to put a fact as old as the credit system into the imagery of the man in “the market." Apparently the rea son why we are not accustomed to describe the financial panic and its background of debts in this language is that we have been dominated by the illusion that, since gold is our standard of value, the value of a fixed weight of it must be the same. When we chart an index of wholesale prices we assume the curve for the price of gold to be a straight line. When we chart the value of gold we assume the curve for the general price level to be i straight line. When both curves appear on the same chart they do not tell a true story unless we remember the plan on which they are constructed. Using now the curve for the value of gold, it be comes clear that the vast public and private debts created so en thusiastically between 1917 and 1929 were short sales of gold, while that commodity was rela tively cheap. Consequently the rapid rise in its value since 1929 Ifas punished the borrowers, or short sellers of gold, just as th > short sellers of wheat or of a com mon stock might be ruined by a sudden market rally on a similar scale. Their own fault? Partly. But mostly it is the fault of a credit system based upon the laws and customs ot the United States. Our price level ought to nm aero: s the line. It fails to do so principally because our money unit is by law fixed weight, not a fixed value of: gold. The distinction must be em phasized. Our current theory of the debtor's relationship is that he is obligated to deliver an agreed quantity of value. But since we have no established method of measuring that value except by weight, and that weight in a single commodity subject to enorm ous short sales and occasional sharp rallies, the debtor is actually short of an agreed weight of a commodity that can change rapidly in value. This is why he is likely to be wiped out. He is compelled by i law to speculate. * # * If the promised weight of gold! decreased, just as fast as its value j per gain increased, the amount of | value to be delivered would re main the same. The fact of debt orship would then be consistent with our theory of it. If we had a money unit which was defined in such a way that this would hap pen, borrowers would still be short sellers of dollars, but since these dollars would actually represent al ways approximately the same quantity of purchasing power, the speculative character of the bor rowing transaction would disap pear. This is not a new suggestion; it lias been under more or less dis cussion for 50 years; it has been a proposal before congress for more than a decade, and within the last few weeks its most con spicuous sponsors have been the members of the committee for the nation, headed by Frank A. Van derlip. Professor Irving Fisher of Yale and D. J. Tinnes of North Dakota have been vigorous expon ents of it for a generation. By this principle any chosen general price level can be attained and ap proximately maintained. Any con siderable variation would auto matically set at work corrective measures. The resulting expectation of an early restoration of the general j price index to its accustomed level j would encourage buyers to take ■ advantage of every reaction and sellers to enter the market on each bulge. This confidence and the re-j suiting market behavior would probably be enough to keep neces-1 sary changes in the weight of the dollars very small over consider-! able periods. Even if the power to change the weight of the dollar j in order to keep a steady price level were merely held in reserve by the secretary of the treasury for occasions when ordinary cor-j rective measures by the federal reserve system might prove inade quate. it would be a powerful sup port of confidence in the price, level among the debtors and cred itors. This confidence in the price level is fundamental to prosperity. * * * The proposed virtual elimination of general price-level changes from our economic system is not designed to protect debtors or in vestors who put their money into a relatively overdone line of busi ness. When any pefson incurs a debt for any other purpose than to hoard cash he is not merely In the position of a short seller of dollars, he is also a buyer of other things on margin. If his own par ticular product or investep assets decline m value, hi. equity may be wiped out, even if the dollar is ever so steady. It is not wise to relieve people entirely from the economic con sequences of their own lack of judgment or foresight. There must be some force in operation to pen alize mistakes and to encourage private initiative to balance pro duction. The proposed plan would protect debtors as forced short sellers of the dollar, but not as mistaken buyers of other property on margin. It would be merciful to the lambs, because they could eventually suffer only the relative decline in their particular assets, and the lambs who were actually helping efficiently to balance pro duction would be secure. It is vital to social welfare that this be ac complished. Under the present system, with the lambs- margin cut not only by the falling value of their own particular assets, but also slashed by the rising value of fixed weights of gold, we have a sheep-killing dollar. Because of it our debtors must pay their pound of flesh. Fixed weights are absolute; val ues are relative and ever-changing things. Our standard of value must take account of this fact. No money unit can function ade quately in the credit system unless is is based upon the relativity of values. Its value must be. defined in terms of the fairest available index of the general price level. There is no other convenient way of protecting those who have to sell short. No one commodity, no pair of commodities, is suitable for use by fixed weight for this purpose, because short selling of such commodities in enormous vol ume immediately is required by the system, and the standard itself becomes dangerously speculative. * * * This threatened rise can be pre vented or postponed. We can limit and balance production through a system of regulated trade asso ciations; we can adjust the gold dollar according to a price index: or we can, temporarily, sell gold short faster than we cover the short sales. The third of these possibilities is what seems to hap pen during the prosperity phase of of the business cycle, but, since the short selling must sooner or later be balanced by short cover ing, this prosperity must be per iodically interrupted. The late lamented new era was one of these necessarily intermit tent booms, and as the floods of goods began to force down the fixed-weight-dollar price level in 1929, many debtors .began to be squeezed between the falling prices for their commodities on the one hand and the rising value of gold on the other. Some conspicuous debtor was bound to fail in due time. When that occurred the frightened shorts in gold naturally began bidding against one an other to cover their existing con tracts. Hoarding of dollars by pos essors made the bidding by the shorts even more disastrous. The supply was restricted at the very moment that the demand became frantic. * * * . , Those who do not comprehend these realities are likely to look upon commodity price declines as putting a comfortable standard of living within reach of the humble worker. A rising wage, which a steady price level will allow busi ness to pay safely, is the direction in which the worker's economic welfare must be sought. If we had a steady price level the whole question of profits, wages and bal anced production could be solved with iar gieater care than under the present arrangement. Gradu ally falling price levels are con sistent with prosperity only if the declines are slow enough not to j squeeze or frighten the gold shorts. * » * There is, then, truth in the claim of the technocrats about "smash-j ing the price system.” The fixed weight dollar is obsolete, because with it you cannot maintain a steady price level as goods be come more and more abundant. If you cannot approximately main tain the price level you cannot pre vent the pinch of the debtors or short sellers of the dollar; if you squeeze the short sellers of the dollar you paralyze the credit sys-; tern. We can still have a price system, but it must be based upon a money unit that respects the actual relativity of values: for the sting of short selling is the squeeze, and the strength of the squeeze is the law. But we can inflate credit! And if that doesn’t raise prices we can inflate the currency! sji # a»* 1 Yes, although we have already inflated credit by billions, we can still sell gold short faster than we cover the short sales. But is the game worth the candle? As goods again become more and more abundant their prices in gold are bound to decline. Gold must rise in value relative to the more and more abundant goods. This must again pinch those who have sold short by weight. Some of them will be squeezed into conspicuous failure, and the remainder of the story will be repeated in the regu lar sequence. No scheme will work with stead iness that involves the short selling of fixed weights of any commod ity on the vast scale now required by the credit system, especially in the presence of the machine technology. The price index gold dollar is a necessity for sustained economic welfare. Current LITERATURE By JOHN SELBY TT IS possible that when William Seabrook set out from Paris to fly to Timbuctoo he rather hoped he would be lost (only temporarily, of course) in the Sahara desert. : That would have made a corking ! story, and Mr. Seabrook can do 1 full justice to corking stories. But nothing happened to him. j directly, on the whole trip. Flying the Sahara is in itself a feat, but ; the flying was done by Rene Wauthier, French airman. And there might have been an element of loneliness and so forth about : such a jaunt—but the third mem ber of the party was Marjorie Worthington, the novelist, who is ! by no means an inarticulate per l son. In “Air Adventure,” one gets the feeling of flying over a vast but thrilling nothingness, and when one lands, there are excellent ! descriptions of odd places and odd people—not savages and such, but ; chiefly civilized persons reacting variously to life in and near a desert. Such is the tale of the keeper of what probably is the lonelifest gasoline pump in the world, in the middle of the Sahara, J “Bidon Cinq.” There were two keepers, in fact. One went insane and imagined he was pestered by a Taureg chief tain who played the flute, and his I ----- Washington Bystander.. MMMMiM5Ba3E2Ea3BSE523E3M52iaHfiESSSS2H& WASHINGTON, May 17.—There ” is no record of any proposal to amend the national constitution having made such swift progress through its final routine stages an was the case with the prohibition* repeal resolution. Once the senate registered its astonishing about face on the matter the thing went like greased lightning. But whether the final rush in congress is a fair indication as to what to expect from the states or not is a matter of debate. Only time can tell. Assuming that there has been no ratification before the regular session of the 73rd congress as sembles next January, it is quite clear that there will then be loud and long debate of the power of congress to determine details of the state convention system of ratification. Since the Rubicon ha3 been crossed in that repealer, however, and the alternative method of state conventions been resorted to for the first time in constitutional his tory, it would appear to follow that hereafter no constitutional amendment is likely to be submit ted in any other way, unless it might be a routine matter facing little opposition, like Norris's “an ti-lame duck’’ amendment. * * * Take any other change made in ^ the constitution in modern times and the situation would have been different. From popular election of senators and women suffrage to child labor or income tax matters, not one of these probably would have escaped the state convention ratification requirement had there been precedent to follow. That system provides in the case of the prohibition repealer the di rect appeal to voters for which the j wets have long clamored. It also provides, it should bo re 1 membered, 48 possible last ditches I for waging popular campaigns against ratification only thirteen of I which need to be held to block ac tion. * * * The precedent for convention ratification is now set. Whatever happens to the repealer, it seems certain it will be followed here after in any matter' upon which public interest is greatly aroused. And if that is the case, the ques tion of the power of congress to f establish a standard form for such conventions in order to insure ex actly the same type of popular ref erendum in all states is certain to come up again very actively before long. successor, balanced enough in most ways, was so hungry he not only ate a full meal, but devoured the entire carcas3 of a chicken, ex cepting only a couple of bones. And near the end there is a surprise. Somebody actually did get lost in the Sahara, and the somebody was not Professional Adventure Seeker Seabrook, but Mi3s Worthington. She did a good job of it, was found before she had suffered too much, and so every one flew very happily back to Paris. "Air Adventure” probably will be ranked as good entertainment by .most readers, but not along side earlier Seabrook tales, such as “Jungle Ways," or “Magic Island.” May 17, 1933 2 Dear friends: | In my day I've heard plenty of people complain about the weather. But as a friend of mine used to say— “nobody's ever done anything about it yet.” An' that’s about right! That's just the way weather is different from watches. If there’s something wrong with your watch—something can be done about it. Mr. Skeie is a regular genius at fixing watches. If your watch is running too fast or too slow, I'd suggest that you bring it in. Mr. Skeie will examine your watch and give an estimate of the cost of repairing, free of charge. Cleaning is now $2.50; mainsprings, $1.50; round crystals glass, 50c; non-break, 75c; fancy crystals, $1.00 and $1.25. § TICK 1 927 'C Phont | Willamette 411 1 g ..-'"■■■■''-°-Tmt1lt<t|l»tlllllllllllll«lllllllllll|llllllll«Mll>«lir rne gionous way! p* SAN FRANCISCO $115? Round Trip • ID. *20 r 4 " “ LOS ANGELES (Harbor) BERTH & MEALS Round Trip INCLUDED $30 sailing every TUES. ■"MWar* SAN DIEGO $25 Round Trip $35 Tuesday, June 6th Reservations & Tickets; " * 152 Broadway, PORTLAND LINES