Co-eds Against Athletes Getting All Campus Jobs Men Divided on Question of Partiality in Placing University Work Curricula, Not Sports Big Influence on Preppers BY THE EDITOR The story books say that co-eds just dote on athletes; but if we judge from the returns on Emerald questionnaires, the story books found their material in other places than the University of Oregon. Here are the statistics: The eo-eds were asked, “Do you favor preference to athletes in dis tribution of campus jobs?” In ans wer 71 per cent of the ladies thun dered “No,” while the remaining 29 per cent admitted that athletes should be given the best of the bargain. College Men More Generous The college men are a bit more generous with their fellow athletes, 52 per cent believing that athletes should receive more consideration than the average man. There is a very strong tendency for fraternity folk to favor the athlete, while non fraternity people are quite willing, speaking generally, that he should shift for hinaself. The athletic reputation of the University has been almost a neg ligible factor in inducing students to enroll at Oregon. Less than three per cent of the freshman men listed athletics as a attraction, while of the women, only two freshman wom en, or less than one per cent of the first year co-eds considered the athletic reputation of the Universi ty in making their choice of alma mater. Of course these figures on the “athletic reputation” of the University are open to two inter pretations: First, the University may not have any “athletic reputa tion” or secondly, it may be inter preted that prospective students are not interested in athletics before they reaeh college. Many Attractions mmom The latter is probably the case, since approximately 35 per cent of the first year men reported that the scholastic reputation and cours es offered were the main attrac tions. Other factors inducing the student to enroll were: They wanted to come to the state University; they have friends at the University; it was near home. Even though athletics play a small part in indncing the prospec tive student to come to the Univer sity, once here the students have little grudge against intercollegiate and intra-mural and inter-organiza tion athletics. Fifty-seven per cent of the students wish inter-col legiate athletics to roeeivo the same emphasis as at present, and 26 per cent wish more emphasis on this type of athletics, making all told 83 per cent of the student body wishing as much or more emphasis on intercollegiate athletics than at present. Fourteen per cent wish less emphasis, and the remaining three per cent wish to see this kind athletics abolished altogether. Fraternity membership, sex and ■olnss seem to have litie effect on :the general attitude. Both men and women agree that inter-class and inter-organization athletics should be increased, 82 per cent of the former and 71 per cent of the latter being in favor fif more intra-mural sports. Athletics are gi.ven little blame for poor scholarship, only three or four per cent of blame being laid at the door of “too much athletics.” Candidates (Continued from page one) an on the executive council. Bho is this year secretary of the junior class She was on the student union committee for 1925 and 1926, lieut enant of the Big Sister movement of the Women’s League this year, general chairman of the sophomore class dance last year. Miss Runes lives at Hendricks hall. Dot Ward out Pot Ward and Ulenna Fisher are new candidates for senior women on student council. Dot AVnrd, ’-7, is a nuember of the 1$>26 Oregana staff, has been active in Y. W. C. A. work, and was on the Frosh Glee committee her first year. Sho is affiliated with Alpha Omieron Pi and is a member of the W. A. A. Glenna Fisher, ’27, is a member of the junior week-end committee served on the student union com mittee, and was sergeant at arms for the Won