The nugget. (Sisters, Or.) 1994-current, June 13, 2018, Page 2, Image 2

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    2 
Wednesday, June 13, 2018 The Nugget Newspaper, Sisters, Oregon
O
P
I
N I
O
N
Where is the love for
Oregon and Country?
Steve Nugent
Guest Columnist
Letters to the Editor…
The Nugget welcomes contributions from its readers, which must include the writer’s name, address and phone number. Let-
ters to the Editor is an open forum for the community and contains unsolicited opinions not necessarily shared by the Editor.
The Nugget reserves the right to edit, omit, respond or ask for a response to letters submitted to the Editor. Letters should be
no longer than 300 words. Unpublished items are not acknowledged or returned. The deadline for all letters is noon Monday.
To the Editor:
I noticed that many of the prescribed burns 
on National Forest Land have a lot of fresh 
stumps and large piles of left-behind branches, 
presumably from the logged trees.
Though I understand that fire is a natural 
part of the cycle, I feel confused over the idea 
that intentionally setting fires outside of the 
natural  fire  season,  potentially  setting/con-
trolling  those  fires  with  chemicals,  cutting 
down trees, hauling the cut trees away, pil-
ing remaining branches up, and creating new 
roads to manage these prescribed areas is any-
where close to what would happen in a natural 
fire event. 
My understanding of a natural fire is that 
the trees and down wood burn during the time 
of year when nature deems it to happen. How 
is  the  current  strategy  actually  mimicking 
nature by intentionally causing fires without 
leaving  all  of  the  trees  and  down  wood  in 
place? Isn’t fire ecology about allowing the 
down  wood  and  remaining  trees  to  burn  in 
place so that the resulting ashes can feed the 
current and future flora and fauna? Where is 
all the wood going?
Leslie Hawes
s
s
s
To the Editor:
I would like to respond to the guest column 
(“Open the gate,” The Nugget, June 6, page
2) by Glenn Brown.
First of all, he is wrong when he stated that 
ODOT  plows  the  road  twice.  ODOT  plows 
the road only once and it isn’t to make a bike 
See LETTERS on page 24
Sisters Weather Forecast
Courtesy of the National Weather Service, Pendleton, Oregon
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Sunny
Mostly Sunny
Partly Cloudy
Light Rain
Showers
Showers
70/40
73/43
71/44
73/50
73/50
80/53
The Nugget Newspaper, LLC
Website: www.nuggetnews.com
442 E. Main Ave., P.O. Box 698, Sisters, Oregon 97759
Tel: 541-549-9941 | Fax: 541-549-9940 | editor@nuggetnews.com
Postmaster: Send address changes to
The Nugget Newspaper,
P.O. Box 698, Sisters, OR 97759.
Third Class Postage Paid at Sisters, Oregon.
Editor in Chief: Jim Cornelius
Production Manager: Leith Easterling
Classifieds & Circulation: Teresa Mahnken
Graphic Design: Jess Draper
Community Marketing Partners:
Patti Jo Beal & Vicki Curlett
Accounting: Erin Bordonaro
Proofreader: Pete Rathbun
Owner: J. Louis Mullen
The Nugget is mailed to residents within the Sisters School District; subscriptions are available outside delivery area.
Third-class postage: one year, $45; six months (or less), $25. First-class postage: one year, $85; six months, $55.
Published Weekly. ©2018 The Nugget Newspaper, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited. All advertising which
appears in The Nugget is the property of The Nugget and may not be used without explicit permission. The Nugget Newspaper, Inc. assumes no liability or responsibility for
information contained in advertisements, articles, stories, lists, calendar etc. within this publication. All submissions to The Nugget Newspaper will be treated as uncondition-
ally assigned for publication and copyrighting purposes and subject to The Nugget Newspaper’s unrestricted right to edit and comment editorially, that all rights are currently
available, and that the material in no way infringes upon the rights of any person. The publisher assumes no responsibility for return or safety of artwork, photos, or manuscripts.
Jeff  Mackey’s  letter 
last  week  supported  Greg 
Walden for trying to repeal 
Obamacare  and  replace  it 
with  Walden’s  bare-bones 
plan that would have resulted 
in 1/3 of Central Oregonians 
losing  their  health  insur-
ance. This  plan  was  unani-
mously rejected by all heath-
care  organizations.  Even 
Republicans  realized  that 
it was garbage and voted it 
down.
You cannot convince me 
that Walden is looking after 
Central  Oregonians’  best 
interests.
I participated in protests 
to get Walden to hold a Town 
Hall  in  Bend  on  his  health 
plan.  He  never  showed  his 
face to defend it.
Health insurance is a bur-
den for everyone, until you 
need  it.  I  have  heard  many 
stories from those who hated 
Obamacare  until  they  were 
really sick and realized how 
great it is. Rather than modi-
fying Obamacare to address 
its  weaknesses,  Walden’s 
plan  would  have  replaced 
it  with  low-quality,  cheap 
insurance with payout limits, 
no included preventive care, 
eliminating  the  Individual 
Mandate  and  Medicaid 
expansion.  Totally  worth-
less and likely to cause many 
people to go into bankruptcy 
or  die  when  catastrophic 
health  issues  occur,  with 
nothing  to  keep  insurance 
companies in check. 
W h a t   c o n s e r v a t i v e s 
need  to  realize  is  that 
Obamacare  was  based  on 
a  GOP  plan  already  imple-
mented  and  working  well 
in Massachusetts. This plan 
used market-forces and pri-
vate  insurance  marketplace 
rather than government-con-
trolled healthcare like most 
other  developed  countries 
have.  ACA  enabled  mil-
lions of consumers to have 
healthcare for the first time. 
It cost more for a few, but the 
insurance was much better. 
Obama backed this because 
he  wanted  buy-in  from 
Republicans in Congress. If 
left to his own preferences, 
I suspect that Obama would 
go for a Bernie Sanders-style 
single-payer  system  con-
trolled  by  the  government 
instead.  Obama  was  trying 
to  get  compromise  on  this 
rather than something that the 
other party would object to.
For  this  compromise, 
Obama got years of obstruc-
tion  in  return.  It  became 
a political football for
Republicans  to  discredit 
Obama. It’s still a good plan 
and the ONLY way to get to 
a  market-driven  insurance 
system that actually works.
Then Mackey asks “What 
did  I  miss?”  listing  lower 
taxes,  rule  of  law,  creating 
jobs and greater security that 
he believes we have now, as 
if Walden or Trump had any-
thing to do with these.
Trump  has  created  the 
illusion  of  greater  security 
rather than actually improv-
ing it. How is it possible that 
we are more secure when:
• He has done everything 
that Putin wants in order to 
break up the world order that 
has benefited the U.S. since 
WWII and degrade our posi-
tion as world leaders, includ-
ing: Non-support of NATO, 
siding with Russia on Assad, 
starting trade-wars with our 
allies and backing out of the 
Iran nuclear deal.
• He  trades  insults  pub-
licly  with  North  Korea, 
almost escalating to nuclear 
war
• Allies are now reluctant 
to share intelligence because 
it  might  get  disclosed  pub-
licly by Trump
• FBI  informants  are 
now  reluctant  to  cooper-
ate  because  they  might  be 
compromised
• Allies  don’t  trust  our 
word  anymore  because  we 
are backing out of so many 
agreements
• Russians  can  interfere 
with our politics and spread 
propaganda  with  impunity 
and  the  Whitehouse  says 
nothing
• Immigrant  parents  are 
being  separated  from  their 
children,  against  interna-
tional law
• True  felons  are  being 
pardoned  for  political 
purposes
• Nothing significant is
being  done  to  address  the 
opioid crisis
• Rhetoric  from  Trump 
has made some of the popu-
lation  untrusting  of  legiti-
mate news sources and trust-
ing of political propaganda 
from dubious sources
• Trump  himself  uses 
unsecured phones for official 
communication.  If  Hillary 
did this, she would be in jail.
Rule of law? You must be 
kidding. Laws only apply to 
the little people in the U.S. 
now.  Laws  don’t  apply  to 
Trump.
Opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the writer and
are not necessarily shared by the Editor or The Nugget Newspaper.